Ten degrees above normal in the midwest.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
funny how people could feel the heat when it was hot
nowadays it’s cold when it’s warm so only climatologists can understand
so only climatologists can understand
nice!
A mother and baby are shown trying to sleep in the park.
Does any of the following sound familiar?
Co2, the Satanic gas.
Wow, none of you figured out that a map that shows the difference from “normal” is only meaningful when you know what that “normal” is?
Yes, 1934 was 10 deg. F above average, but the average was the PRE-1934 average. If you made the same map for 1934 but compared to the 1971 to 2000 average, you would see a very different map.
It’s amazing how you guys can’t even figure out how to read and display a graph accurately, but dare to suggest the scientists are engaged in fraud!
Unless you DO know the error you’ve made, and it was intentional…. A case of the pot calling the kettle black?
Don’t start spamming the thread.
As I have already explained to you, the discrepancy is at least an order of magnitude larger than any possible differences in the baseline. Given the precision of the color bands (2 degrees) a few tenths of a degree will not have any effect on the maps.
Now take a deep breath and try using your brain.