Ten degrees above normal in the midwest.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
funny how people could feel the heat when it was hot
nowadays it’s cold when it’s warm so only climatologists can understand
so only climatologists can understand
nice!
A mother and baby are shown trying to sleep in the park.
Does any of the following sound familiar?
Co2, the Satanic gas.
Wow, none of you figured out that a map that shows the difference from “normal” is only meaningful when you know what that “normal” is?
Yes, 1934 was 10 deg. F above average, but the average was the PRE-1934 average. If you made the same map for 1934 but compared to the 1971 to 2000 average, you would see a very different map.
It’s amazing how you guys can’t even figure out how to read and display a graph accurately, but dare to suggest the scientists are engaged in fraud!
Unless you DO know the error you’ve made, and it was intentional…. A case of the pot calling the kettle black?
Don’t start spamming the thread.
As I have already explained to you, the discrepancy is at least an order of magnitude larger than any possible differences in the baseline. Given the precision of the color bands (2 degrees) a few tenths of a degree will not have any effect on the maps.
Now take a deep breath and try using your brain.