Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Margaret Thatcher 1988 : Global Warming “second only to a global nuclear war”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Maggie was persuaded by John Houghton.
I doubt she was ever really signed up, but tried to use it as way to promote nuclear power, which in turn would reduce dependence on coal, so marginalising Arthur Scargill and co.
And what politician can’t resist the electoral advantages of saving the planet.
She was supposed to be made of steel.
Boy, she really knows how to scare people. And she’s a superhero of the right. Global warming is supposed to be from the left. She’s the one that kicked this little game off. Reminds me why I hate politics.
Thatcher becomes latest recruit in Monckton’s climate sceptic campaign
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/22/thatcher-climate-sceptic-monckton
Monckton’s use of Britain’s former PM illustrates that climate denialism is about politics, not science
(pot, kettle, luminosity challenged)