NASA lost the plot 35 years ago.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- _Jim on Mann Says He Was Correct
- _Jim on Mann Says He Was Correct
- D. Boss on Mann Says He Was Correct
- D. Boss on Mann Says He Was Correct
In the article I read:
NASA should stick to space exploration and get out of the global warming SCAM. ;O)
Correction:
There should be an “e” at the end of atmospher[e]
Steve,
The article starts by saying we don’t know enough about climate and need to study it, and then goes on to hypothesize a cooling due to increased pollution. this is the position that Schneider and others took at the same time, and was a perfectly reasonable hypothesis at the time
So NASA should be doing climate instead of space?
Steve,
I think we should be doing a lot more regarding space travel, but certainly the capabilities of satellite analysis of the earth are too important to ignore. I don’t see a need for a separate organization for each objective.
and nothing has changed in 35 years………
We still don’t know enough and we’re still predicting……….
Spiro Agnew? Another great name from the past. Spiro=Absolute O!
“the capabilities of satellite analysis of the earth are too important to ignore.”
@Tony,
GISS ignores satellite temperatures and uses corrupt surface stations data for its “global temperature”. Yet another inconvenient truth.
I sure am glad the Earth is at its perfect temperature. According to the experts, one degree either way would be the end of civilization.
We are adapted to the current climate. A rapid change in either direction could be disruptive. This is not hard to understand. If natural changes are occurring over which we have no control then we would need to plan ahead to adapt as best we can. If man made factors are causing global or regional climate changes then developing a balance of mitigation and adaptive measures is called for. I repeat, this is not hard to understand.
HAHAHAHA! Mikey made another funny!
Winter US mean temperature has dropped three degrees since 1998.
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html
It would be interesting to find out how much additional energy use was due to this.
If the present record cold weather in the Northern Hemisphere is the result of Global Warming as some alarmists suggest.
What would happen if the global temperatures started to drop, would the NH become
tropical ?
Temperatures in the Arctic region have been very high this winter. Isn’t that part of the Northern Hemisphere?
HAHAHAHA!! Two funnies made by Mikey, you are on a roll this evening!
Take a vacation in the Arctic
James E. Hansen?
It would be interesting to know who the authors of this NASA report were. Was climate alarmist/activist James E. Hansen of NASA involved? He had developed a computer program which was used to predict global cooling in the 70-ies, but he denies that he himself has advocated global cooling.
That little newspaper clipping doesn’t even cite the title of the report, so how can we find out the author(s)?
I remember the skies turning brownish along the Atlantic ocean horizon as I grew up in Florida. No one really liked it. It was ugly. Pollution was noticeable. The clear skies were gone. People were having recognizable problems with air over heavily polluted cities. Leaded gasoline fell out of favor along with CFCs. Then came a new cry, the evil of CO2 and global warming. Connecting the dots to these two were easy. However, science has advanced and we now know this is truly in error. CO2 really plays only a slight, almost entirely negligible role. We have discovered the real reasons behind climate change to be solar related, changes in the oceans, cloud cover, position of the planets and so on. We might be better off not worrying at this time about the climate and restore the land for farming and allow the fish to replenish the oceans. Take the greenhouse out of the sky and put more of them in the backyards.
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?
So make up your minds already? Will pollutions cause the earth to warm or cool?
I guess their minds go wherever the money goes?