Our top climate scientists tell us that the storms are being caused by nonexistent warm, wet air.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- _Jim on Mann Says He Was Correct
- _Jim on Mann Says He Was Correct
A reply in comments to me from a woman at NSIDC was, to the effect, to ask did I think there would be less snow in a global warming world. I knew she meant did I think that with more evaporation in a global warming world could that result in less snow.
But, here we are with less moisture but more snow. It would seem she had it partly right with there being more snow. But with winter 2001/10 having the second greatest snow extent on record she didn’t have that part right either. Because according to global warming ‘science’ there will be more snow in a smaller area, i.e., less extent.
Doh!
Maybe global warming science will get something right some day. But then even a broken clock is exactly right twice a day.
“Our top climate scientists tell us that the storms are being caused by nonexistent warm, wet air.”
Only fitting these “top” climate scientists are fully supported by a nonexistent concensus.
We will see how bold our Top Federal scientists are in the next budget phase, after they become non-supported with non-existent funds.
They said “more moisture” from the thawing Arctic…
It has not been more moisture, it has been less.
Let me just go ahead and say it for all the bedwetters – this is all completely consistent with global warming and was predicted by climate scientists using their GCMs.
Playstation Sim Planet!
Uhh, they’re using that high tech of a machine? Now I am impressed. They can probably make any picure they want with that setup.
And if it snows, or rains, or is cold, or hot, or dry, or windy, or calm, just remember – it is all consistent with AGW theory and was predicted using Sim Planet.
Just think, the USA is getting 0.1 F warmer every 10 years. In 100 years it might be 1.0 F warmer. So that justfies spending billions to study climate change and hundreds of billions in past and future taxes on carbon. How stupid are we to allow the theft of our future.
From the NOAA website referenced above: “… The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade.
… The precipitation trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is -0.01 inches per decade.”
For the contiguous US the official trends are 1.0F/century (0.55C/century) and flat for precipitation. How can Gore et al say that anything that happens in or near the US of A is a product of global warming?
The regional aspect of “global warming” seems lost. If we were to identify the top region of warming each year, identify and remove it from the global record, what would happen? I suspect that we’d see that the average “global” trend is cooling, not warming.
Anyone care to disagree?
droughtflood
Actually Doug, since 1998, the globe HAS been cooling.
http://thetruthpeddler.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/latest-data-confirms-a-global-cooling-trend/
I agree with Hal, lets see how many support AGW and Gore when the money starts to run out. Scientists like most educated people, follow the money….