It now has the original file date, too. I’d sure like to know who modified the file on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 6:33:14 PM.
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Wow! That was fast. Congratulations Steven. They are responding to you and to the ‘evil’ blogosphere.
Now, how will they cover their tracks on this coverup?
And, more importantly, how will they explain the 1930s?
Pingback: Controversial NASA temperature graphic morphs into garbled mess | Watts Up With That?
Well, we could file a FOIA but we all know how that will get treated.
But it will provide a great opportunity to set up a new review committee who will work really hard investigating why the FOIA law was not followed and then demonstrate the innocence of those involved. I love reruns.
Hmm…. that was strange.
Storm in a tea cup I suspect. In computing it is quite normal for a ‘Restore’ from a previous ‘Backup’ to revert the file to exactly what it was before any corruption. This looks like the kind of data that you would get if the disk on which the file resides had a low level corruption in it. When it was noticed/pointed out someone did a ‘Restore’ and all is back to where it was.
The file header was modified to a different color depth. The only way that could happen is if someone modified it.
I am just a novice regarding weather analysis so bear with me, but I noticed that the two charts comparing anomalies of U.S. and World Temperatures are at different scales. If you are actually comparing them shouldn’t the scale be the same? If the charts were at the same scale, then wouldn’t the global increase in temperatures look much less significant.
Yes, the slope would have less of an incline in the global graph if the scale were the same as the U.S. graph. But that’s not really the issue. You see the U.S. graph? That was from one of Hansen’s original works. Today, the same graph looks very different. Here’s Steve’s blink comparison to the graph of the U.S. temps then and what Hansen says now.
http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/1998changesannotated.gif?w=500&h=355&h=355
Having to restore the old graph must grind on more than a couple of people at GISS.