A heretic in Al Gore’s backyard.
Dr. Arvid Pasto, former Director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) High Temperature Materials Laboratory
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/aiche/presentations/AGW_AIChE.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
If people would just educate themselves a little,
4000 ppm, ice age
3000 ppm, ice age
2000 ppm, ice age
Where’s the tipping point?
They’re pissing in their pants about 390 ppm, when the tipping point seems to be anything over 1000 ppm throws us into another ice age……….
Bedwetters all of them!
Hansen in 1998 (to everyone): “See??.. See??”
Hansen in 2011 (to himself): “Oh..”
Hansen wasn’t grossly exaggerating. He was incorrect. His model was and is incorrect. That’s quite different from an exaggeration.
Repeat – Hansen’s climate model is incorrect. There is no reason to believe him at all. He is proven to have a bad model for the climate.
Kevin, what does Tracey think?
Scenario A is the more extreme position. Jan 11/2011 RealClimate: Schmidt says that Scenario B is close, though he admits “warm” to the record. Scenario C, in which no emissions come after 2000 – a reference scenario – tracks well. It is outside of my understanding, but GS says B is “useful”, but C is not. And B is to be discussed, not C.
When a random or nonsensical scenario most closely matches your prediction, then either you have stumbled into an important causation (or info on one), or your hypothesis may be nonsense also. It certainly should make you wonder. And worry.