A heretic in Al Gore’s backyard.
Dr. Arvid Pasto, former Director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) High Temperature Materials Laboratory
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/aiche/presentations/AGW_AIChE.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
If people would just educate themselves a little,
4000 ppm, ice age
3000 ppm, ice age
2000 ppm, ice age
Where’s the tipping point?
They’re pissing in their pants about 390 ppm, when the tipping point seems to be anything over 1000 ppm throws us into another ice age……….
Bedwetters all of them!
Hansen in 1998 (to everyone): “See??.. See??”
Hansen in 2011 (to himself): “Oh..”
Hansen wasn’t grossly exaggerating. He was incorrect. His model was and is incorrect. That’s quite different from an exaggeration.
Repeat – Hansen’s climate model is incorrect. There is no reason to believe him at all. He is proven to have a bad model for the climate.
Kevin, what does Tracey think?
Scenario A is the more extreme position. Jan 11/2011 RealClimate: Schmidt says that Scenario B is close, though he admits “warm” to the record. Scenario C, in which no emissions come after 2000 – a reference scenario – tracks well. It is outside of my understanding, but GS says B is “useful”, but C is not. And B is to be discussed, not C.
When a random or nonsensical scenario most closely matches your prediction, then either you have stumbled into an important causation (or info on one), or your hypothesis may be nonsense also. It certainly should make you wonder. And worry.