A heretic in Al Gore’s backyard.
Dr. Arvid Pasto, former Director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) High Temperature Materials Laboratory
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/aiche/presentations/AGW_AIChE.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
If people would just educate themselves a little,
4000 ppm, ice age
3000 ppm, ice age
2000 ppm, ice age
Where’s the tipping point?
They’re pissing in their pants about 390 ppm, when the tipping point seems to be anything over 1000 ppm throws us into another ice age……….
Bedwetters all of them!
Hansen in 1998 (to everyone): “See??.. See??”
Hansen in 2011 (to himself): “Oh..”
Hansen wasn’t grossly exaggerating. He was incorrect. His model was and is incorrect. That’s quite different from an exaggeration.
Repeat – Hansen’s climate model is incorrect. There is no reason to believe him at all. He is proven to have a bad model for the climate.
Kevin, what does Tracey think?
Scenario A is the more extreme position. Jan 11/2011 RealClimate: Schmidt says that Scenario B is close, though he admits “warm” to the record. Scenario C, in which no emissions come after 2000 – a reference scenario – tracks well. It is outside of my understanding, but GS says B is “useful”, but C is not. And B is to be discussed, not C.
When a random or nonsensical scenario most closely matches your prediction, then either you have stumbled into an important causation (or info on one), or your hypothesis may be nonsense also. It certainly should make you wonder. And worry.