Phil said winter was over.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
I have read somewhere that his predictions are about 35% accurate. A great batting average or 3 point percentage.
Yes, and that’s much better than Hansonus Rodenticus, who’s average is 0.0% . It’s all about perspective
😉
Actually that study included the whole US in regards to Phil’s predictions, when you look at only local weather the accuracy is a little over 70%. Depends on whether you are taking a serious look. There are several prognosticating groundhogs all around the country, seemed silly someone made a study for one groundhog with national data. Sounds like something AGW people would do.
Truthsword,
Very good point!
I think you can safely extrapolate over a 1200 km radius….if you are a climate scientist.
He’s not used to heat-caused cold. Groundhogs evolved when cold was caused by cold.
It’s easy to understand how a rodent could be foiled by all that heat trapping gas causing so much cold.
don’t tell me…… Phil’s got a research grant now? Or maybe he just smelled the stench of Climate Science and thought his ragweed allergies were bothering him…
He got a degree in climatology over winter.