Phil said winter was over.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- The Thing Of The Past
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
Recent Comments
- arn on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- William on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- dm on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Francis Barnett on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Robertvd on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Robertvd on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Bob G on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Bob G on The Thing Of The Past
- conrad ziefle on The Thing Of The Past
- Peter Carroll on Expert Government Forecasting
I have read somewhere that his predictions are about 35% accurate. A great batting average or 3 point percentage.
Yes, and that’s much better than Hansonus Rodenticus, who’s average is 0.0% . It’s all about perspective
😉
Actually that study included the whole US in regards to Phil’s predictions, when you look at only local weather the accuracy is a little over 70%. Depends on whether you are taking a serious look. There are several prognosticating groundhogs all around the country, seemed silly someone made a study for one groundhog with national data. Sounds like something AGW people would do.
Truthsword,
Very good point!
I think you can safely extrapolate over a 1200 km radius….if you are a climate scientist.
He’s not used to heat-caused cold. Groundhogs evolved when cold was caused by cold.
It’s easy to understand how a rodent could be foiled by all that heat trapping gas causing so much cold.
don’t tell me…… Phil’s got a research grant now? Or maybe he just smelled the stench of Climate Science and thought his ragweed allergies were bothering him…
He got a degree in climatology over winter.