Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Peter Carroll on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Peter Carroll on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
- Bob G on AI Climate Math
- Russell Cook on AI Climate Math
- conrad ziefle on AI Climate Math
- Billyjack on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
We’ve got plenty of oil, natural gas, and coal within the borders of the United States. Let’s use it.
I agree with this 100%.
That’s such a tricky concept…….now how would that work again? We’d have more energy, cheaper energy, and higher employment. Hmm………I’m sure there must be a down side…….
We could have a reason to bring our troops home too. The world was running without America being the police of the world. One of the signals a nation is weakening, some say, is over extending itself around the world being a police force.
less dependence on government…
…less votes for democrazies
I agree, I’m still looking for the justification of our presence in Afghanistan.
I though I knew at the beginning, to destroy terrorist training camps. But what we doing there now?? They girls can’t wear bikinis, so why we there?
I think we’re in Afghanistan to blow up caves and mountaintops.
But there are nukes in Pakistan. Al Qaeda wants to steal one and bring it here as a present.
Terrorforming the Earth is never the solution.
CO2 is a valuable life generating resource, let’s use it to grow more plants and food in the process.
So after failing to pass the test of accurately prediciting the global temperature they want to move on to level II where they start fiddling with the climate controls?
What’s level III? Whoops we accidentally started a new ice age but we’re really sure that more messing with the climate will be right this time.
And level IV. Gee, this climate thingy is really hard, can we rest the game to level I?
your argument means you are well aware of the danger of fiddling with the climate without being able to predict it with any accuracy. Yet that’s what we are doing.
It always amuses me that some skeptics of manmade global warming simultaneously dismiss rising CO2 as a problem because our understanding of climate is *too uncertain*. But as soon as they hear about some scientists investigating geo-engineering they shout about how dangerous it is because how can they be thinking of doing such a thing when our understanding of climate is *too uncertain*?
And it amuses me that warmists jump to conclusions all the time.
1) Not all sceptics think alike. I don’t start from the opinion that CO2 doesn’t affect climate, I’m just unconvinced the scientists know how much effect it has. Heck, it could even be ‘worse than they thought’ but you wouldn’t know it from crappy climate science.
2) By ‘fiddling with climate’ I presume you mean emitting CO2 trivially? This hardly ever happens and most people would consider their CO2 emissions important. To get an honest balance about emitting CO2 versus potential risk one has to recognise how much carbon fuels have done and will continue to do for us. Carbon hypocrites seem unable to stop proselytising long enough to try reducing their own CO2. Why would I bother listening to anyone with a greater CO2 footprint than my own?
3) Being unable to make accurate predictions about climate under current conditions means they haven’t understood the relationships between the variables. Over compensating for CO2 could lead to a new ice age that would make global warming look like a walk in the park. I can survive even the worst predicted case of global warming in my lifetime, but even a modest ice age would destroy everything I’ve got.
The hubris is astounding; these people actually think they are gods. I doubt they could even get a tomato plant to grow.
It is silly, isn’t it. Climate has always changed but they think they will somehow stop it.
If you click on my little icon (gravatar), you can see displayed my favorite geoengineering idea of all time. Dr. Seuss had nothing on these Klowns!
I saw that before, it’s another pipe dream.
We can’t accurately predict the weather how can we predict what will happen if we start screwing with the Earth’s environment?
Trust them. They know what they are doing.
There was supposed to be snow at low elevations in the San Francisco area today. It was a buzz on tv and radio here for days. But none here. I kinda wanted to see it.
So they were wrong with a forecast, again. But we’re supposed to believe when they tell us what will happen 50 years from now.
Steve, I follow this closely but never saw the Greenhouse Gases graph from Climate4You, from NASA, clearly showing the atmospheric water vapor is decreaseing, not increasing as modeled in AGW theory.
http://www.climate4you.com/GreenhouseGasses.htm
Boycott National Geographic, like New Scientist Magazine it’s losing the plot!
This post should have been in the nuclear war one, but we can add Scientific America to the list of Magazines that have totally lost the plot and are not talking Science anymore!
too funny. The conspiracy against you guys now includes all the magazines as well.
No, it’e the Koch Bros. It’s always the Koch Bros.
this is just another article to sell mags to their audience….
…after reading the comments, now I know why I stopped reading it
Their audience is the lunatic fringe…………
have you people considered ….if they implement any geoengineering, whenever a weather catastrophe happens we can rightfully sue the whole lot of them …
LOL yeah I thought of that…
…but you can’t sue the government