h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Crashex on Climate Scamming For Profit
It’s got to be on a gene level….
…something in someone genes makes them want to stay under fluorescent lights and dream up this garbage
…not one molecule of real world common sense in a one of them
Not one. Even with people screaming about why it wouldn’t work, they ventured on. Now, the 25,000 pound question, did they learn anything?
no, it wasn’t their money…………
Exactly. The problem is, to them a FAIL is a success because they tried and had good intentions. The problem with that is 95% of everyone else is trying to tell them it will FAIL all along.
I don’t think the numbers are quite that high….
…Obama has around a 50% approval rating
…that means that one out of every two people I see are crackers
maybe…. I think those approval rating numbers have been through some rubust adjustment heh
Fantastic Fail. Very impressive, and educational too.
They should have put a wood burning stove in the “outhouse” classroom.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=av6QSiI5BuOI&refer=us
Satellite can detect sea level rises to 1mm, but can’t even stay in space, yeah I really believe NASA!
lol, no doubt. I wonder if the people believing the precision of the satellites have ever been to the oceans. It’s like they think its a still tub full of bathwater.
That was two years ago today. I thought NASA was afraid of the answers that would be recorded by that satellite!
NASA’s strike rate is getting lower and lower, I think because they fired all the real scientists
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/coal-industry-is-safe-says-greg-combet/story-fn59niix-1225919936683
?????????????????? but we have a tax for the individual person coming how does that make sense?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIrhVo1WA78&feature=related
I’m sure also that solar cells work really well with snow on them. At least they don’t munch birds and bats.
“Between 1751 and 2003, human activities released 626 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere, NASA said. Yet only about 192 billion tons of the gas remained in the atmosphere, according to the agency.
Helping to find out where the missing carbon dioxide went was one of the satellite’s missions. ”
Since it crashed we may never know what happened to all that CO2, however speculation has it that the vast majority ended up in sparkling and foaming beverages, many of them of the “adult” type.
Oh, and a lot of trees and plants have grown since 1751. To think, we pay these people big money.
Didn’t the previous “global warming” satellite crash???
A poll I would like to see:
“What is CO2?”
“What does it show up commonly in everyday life?”
Or maybe, “Do you know beer bubbles are dangerous and will destroy all mankind?”
I still think a huge number of AGW’s believe it’s carbon monoxide that’s the culprit and it’s never made clear by the scientists. It’s always referred to as “carbon”, conjuring up and image of dirty black stuff.