Telegraph Thinks Sea Level Has Risen 18,000 Feet In The Last 9,000 years

13 Responses to Telegraph Thinks Sea Level Has Risen 18,000 Feet In The Last 9,000 years

1. Latitude says:

   February 12, 2011 at 7:20 pm

   There’s also the sunken “roads” in Bimini, and some supposed sunken city 2000ft deep off Cuba……..

   Reply
2. bruce says:

   February 12, 2011 at 7:34 pm

   its a giant squid maze

   Reply
3. Allan says:

   February 12, 2011 at 7:42 pm

   I spotted this months ago. If you look directly to the east there is another more vast grid pattern.

   Reply
4. Al Gored says:

   February 12, 2011 at 7:50 pm

   “Their city is under more than three miles of water.”

   Clearly this just shows just how fast and catastrophic sea level rise will be if we don’t pay more taxes. It is no laughing matter.

   Reply
   • Mike Davis says:

     February 13, 2011 at 2:47 am

     ROFLMAO!!!!

     Reply
5. D. King says:

   February 12, 2011 at 8:05 pm

   Maybe this guy did it!

   http://tinyurl.com/yb3zwkk

   You just never know.

   http://tinyurl.com/6yp5zn

   Reply
6. AlarmistNot says:

   February 12, 2011 at 8:40 pm

   Probably just artifacts of the methods used to define the sea floor topography. Imagine trying to make a contour map of the USA with in-line data samples at a very close spacing yet cross line sampling at 10s and 20s of miles.

   Reply
7. Juergen says:

   February 12, 2011 at 8:51 pm

   The IPCC says:
   Global sea level rose by about 120 m during the several millennia that followed the end of the last ice age (approximately 21,000 years ago), and stabilised between 3,000 and 2,000 years ago.

   3 miles is a lot more than 120 m. It’s not possible that this is Atlantis unless the IPCC is wrong.

   Reply
   • Latitude says:

     February 12, 2011 at 9:04 pm

     It’s not possible that this is Atlantis unless the IPCC is wrong.
     ==========================
     I’m not sure if that’s an oxymoron or not

     Reply
8. Dave N says:

   February 12, 2011 at 9:08 pm

   Refraction?

   Reply
9. John Silver says:

   February 12, 2011 at 9:27 pm

   Sonar artifacts.

   Reply
10. SOYLENT GREEN says:

    February 13, 2011 at 12:28 am

    Speaking of artifacts, Steve. Did you get so curious search engine queries today?
    If you did, I may have part of the…explanation.

    http://cbullitt.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/im-thinking-something-might-be-getting-lost-in-translation/

    An apology may, or may not, be in order. 🙂

    Reply
11. Gurgeh says:

    February 13, 2011 at 1:43 am

    This was explained when this story first broke a year or so ago. It’s lines caused by the sweep pattern of the survey vessel.

    Reply