Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- MLH on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- arn on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- arn on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Best we ban ozone depleting gasses then ha?
Dr Squires calls a runaway greenhouse the result of a “negative feedback”. One who doesn’t know the difference between positive feedback and negative feedback should not be pontificating on feedbacks.
I wish there was a book, compiling all the failed doomsday predictions of these frauds, that I could easily refer to when debating with friends and family. What I’ve found is that I’ll make a wager that whatever it is won’t happen if the prediction is within my lifetime; they never take it.