Unfunded Bloggers (David) Defeating Multibillion Dollar International Climate Scam (Goliath)

http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/

h/t to Marc Morano

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Unfunded Bloggers (David) Defeating Multibillion Dollar International Climate Scam (Goliath)

  1. Latitude says:

    You have to see the irony and humor in all of this….

    when you run out of money, what’s the first to go

    …the liberal BS

  2. omnologos says:

    serendipity afoot

    I was thinking of Watts vs Romm, Goddard vs Romm, McIntyre vs Schmidt. it’s the same story repeating itself.

  3. Jimbo says:

    Slowly but surely sanity is making a comeback. Remember the Cancún climate change summit when Japan refused point blank to extend Kyoto? Slowly but surely we are getting there.

  4. Galvanize says:

    Blinding, diamond…..I have run out of superlatives already.

    Nevertheless, there are still many more White Elephants to bag. Who is next, GISS, CRU….?

    • Nobama says:

      I think they already defunded all climate related efforts at NASA. They want the agency to focus on Space endeavors. Fancy that.

  5. Dave G says:

    What a nice smile I had when I read this

  6. John Silver says:

    Alfred Nobel invented smokeless gun powder.
    Just saying.

  7. Now let’s see what the Senate does with it.

  8. Luetkemeyer: Scientists manipulated climate data, suppressed legitimate arguments in peer-reviewed journals, and researchers were asked to destroy emails, so that a small number of climate alarmists could continue to advance their environmental agenda.

    I guess someone is paying attention.

  9. Nobama says:

    It’s a start. They need to defund Agenda 21 too. A friend tells me the parks service has been closing off vast areas of southeastern Utah because O’sputternik told them to.

  10. Brian says:

    Heres the money line: The U.S. contributes only $2.3 million to the IPCC. Our $2.3 million contribution leverages a global science assessment with global outreach and global technical input – a process we could not carry out alone and one that could come to a halt without U.S. support.

    So, on one hand, the US pays ONLY 2.3 mill, but on the other, this process could COME TO A HALT WITHOUT US SUPPORT

    I think that this is further proof that the people backing the IPCC and everything green are stupid.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *