Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
lol, scientists quoted but not named. But the organization was…. NAS.
“One statistic stands out, a study of temperatures around the globe shows the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for 30 years. The total drop is less than one degree, but in terms of meteorology, that is significant.”
I’d sure like to know who his sources were and where that <1 degree came from.
Google ought to start charging for that service, they could double their profits overnight.
Andy
The truth must be hidden
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xahSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bH8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=5277,2528924&dq=ice+age&hl=en
Check out this one “we are in a definite downward trend” LOL
They treat weather like a stock
http://www.news.com.au/world/arctic-to-be-open-sea-within-10-years/story-e6frfkyi-1225787044532
Check out this one, Ice free by 10 years, but then article says 20-30 years, I guess they have all bases covered?
Documented fact
In 1975 they got the Idea of releasing massive amounts of C02 into the atmosphere to warm up the planet, they quickly realized (in the face of impending doom) that this would be an impossible task with both; the colossal engineering involved and in terms of the cost.
Why did they not release massive amounts of C02 into the atmosphere to prevent global cooling? (which at the time there was a consensus that it was caused naturally).
Why in 2011 (after years of man made global warming lies) when global temperatures are equal to or lower than those in the 70’s, are they Not promoting the Idea of releasing massive amounts of C02 into the atmosphere to warm up the planet?
If you swap “climate change/disruption” with “asteroid strike” or any other major potential disaster, you’ll get the same impression, only we are not paying an asteroid tax yet!
knowing that the science is in these guys hands, you can expect future disasters to be explained away after the event in monetary and political terms, and no one will be held accountable for the complete incompetence wither or not there was a tax in place.
Apologies if seen/posted/commented before, but Andrew Bolt gave a top notch performance.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/dont_know_the_cost_dont_know_if_it_works/
BigTime-Bookmark, The first paragraph alone is a nuclear bomb dropped right on the AGW ‘Satellite Record’ …
The Ice Capades team: Serreze, Julienne and Walt Meier, plus all their sycophantic enablers should be able to see their obvious flaw and now admit that they are cherry pickers of the first order.
Why? I’m glad you asked. It’s because they tout the Satellite Record as an appeal to authority knowing full well that it starts at a very cold period.
This is as deliberately misleading as taking an ultra-modern thermometer and measuring air temperature from 4:00am until 4:00pm. Exactly what result is to be expected? (Hint: not the same result seen from 4:00pm until 4:00am).
We should never forget that exactly the same ‘trick’ also underpins the bulk of the thermometer record. That is, the most often cited data conveniently starts near the end of the Little Ice Age. Exactly what result is to be expected? (Hint: not the same result that would seen with thermometers starting circa 1000 AD).
Hmmm, Satellite record circa 1980 following a dramatic cold period, Thermometers circa 1890 following a dramatic colder period. They couldn’t have planned this scam better if they had tried (or did they?). How is it even possible for a real scientist loyal to the discipline to engage in such practices without either malice or complete incompetence? And they wonder why the people are furious?
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?