This (even more clueless) John Cook wannabe thinks that the Arctic Basin is normally 100% concentration ice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
What I would like to know. How much ice was there in the Arctic 3,000 yrs ago, just a blink of the eye on geological time, when these trees, recently uncovered by glacier melt, were growing.
http://www.cseg.ca/publications/recorder/2008/09sep/sep2008-gussow-nuna.pdf
scroll down a few pages.
Cook, says the ice is less than it should be. I guess these trees should not have been either. Of course, if he is found completely wrong in September, no matter, he meant well.
Steve,
You are the expert. What do you say? At least you are willing to post this.
Andy
I’m not an expert, but the ice is always torn apart by the wind and normally is 5-10% open water.
Craig’s strawmen in the comments following the article accentuate his cluelessness.
Here again we have AGW folks using very, very short time periods, like a week, or in this case one winter, showing us their definitions of climate versus weather.
They are auditioning for “Worst Fantasy Writer Awards”! However they are a blessing to those that are sceptic about the Chicken Little Brigade claims! Most everything they write proves our claims!
If ice is so good, why doesn’t the journalist go sit in the freezer for a couple of hours and see what happens?
Their prediction will be wrong. But no matter, they’ll continue to believe in global warming disasters anyway.