This (even more clueless) John Cook wannabe thinks that the Arctic Basin is normally 100% concentration ice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
What I would like to know. How much ice was there in the Arctic 3,000 yrs ago, just a blink of the eye on geological time, when these trees, recently uncovered by glacier melt, were growing.
http://www.cseg.ca/publications/recorder/2008/09sep/sep2008-gussow-nuna.pdf
scroll down a few pages.
Cook, says the ice is less than it should be. I guess these trees should not have been either. Of course, if he is found completely wrong in September, no matter, he meant well.
Steve,
You are the expert. What do you say? At least you are willing to post this.
Andy
I’m not an expert, but the ice is always torn apart by the wind and normally is 5-10% open water.
Craig’s strawmen in the comments following the article accentuate his cluelessness.
Here again we have AGW folks using very, very short time periods, like a week, or in this case one winter, showing us their definitions of climate versus weather.
They are auditioning for “Worst Fantasy Writer Awards”! However they are a blessing to those that are sceptic about the Chicken Little Brigade claims! Most everything they write proves our claims!
If ice is so good, why doesn’t the journalist go sit in the freezer for a couple of hours and see what happens?
Their prediction will be wrong. But no matter, they’ll continue to believe in global warming disasters anyway.