Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- ‘malice toward the planet’
- Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Ice Free Glacier National Park
- Climate Comedy Cancelled
- Warmest March On Record
- New Climate Metric
- Bad-Faith Trial Misconduct
- Food And Energy Experts
- “Are We Imagining It?”
- The Suffragettes
- Michael Mann Upset
- A Serious Problem
- Miami Drowning
- No Longer The Greatest Existential Threat
- Almost Unanimous Consensus Of Scientists
- Maryland To Drown
- Rapid Virus Mutation
- Wisconsin To Save The Planet
- Magical Musk
- “Scientists Forecast”
- “thing of the past” update
- Defunding The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on ‘malice toward the planet’
- Gamecock on 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- gordon vigurs on ‘malice toward the planet’
- Stewartpid on 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- czechlist on 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- william on New Climate Metric
- Ulric Lyons on Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- arn on New Climate Metric
- william on New Climate Metric
- Alastair on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
CA and TX track each other well in the 2001-2007 region. Before and after that, CA is higher unless you go back as far as 1991. I think a comparison to Washington might be better, as TX and WA track each other much better until recently.
Or heck, use CO. CO unemployment was lower than TX pretty much the entire time (1990 onward) until 2008…wasn’t that around the time we switched from red to blue?
-Scott
Blue states have more people that have been bullied and victimized by white males.
you need to qualify that with, “perceived bullying, and victimization, because someone told them they were before they even knew they were”
That’s because a lot of Texans are working in wind farms nowadays
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11837896
“But the Mayor of Sweetwater, Greg Wortham, puts me right on that. Support for wind energy, he explains, is based on the jobs and wealth generated.
A single wind turbine can earn a landowner $10,000 a year. A field of cotton can more than double its revenue if turbines are planted.
It’s popular – but whatever you do, don’t mention the climate, say Mr Wortham. It’s too polarising.
“Carbon footprint, green, climate change – those issues are so charged in the US that really the fact that this produces energy and revenue… and other things we say we’re for, there are just certain labels that cause people to form into groups. ”
Perhaps California can follow Texas’ good example?
Andy
Out riding the range rounding up the turbine parts which fly off.
I’d guess that is not what they mainly do.
Andy