Remember, this is the same Mitchell mentioned by the AMS “Myth” paper by Peterson, Connolley and somebody else (yes, THAT Connolley!), using the immortal words:
“By the early 1970s, when Mitchell updated his work (Mitchell 1972), THE NOTION OF A GLOBAL COOLING TREND WAS WIDELY ACCEPTED, albeit poorly understood”
Of course, none of the warmists (truly deniers of history, that lot..) will ever accept that GLOBAL COOLING means “global cooling” and WIDELY ACCEPTED means “there was a consensus”.
In a sane time….
…we would be trying to make the planet warmer
The climate can get colder. Or it could get warmer. Only now is it doing both at the same time!
Remember, this is the same Mitchell mentioned by the AMS “Myth” paper by Peterson, Connolley and somebody else (yes, THAT Connolley!), using the immortal words:
“By the early 1970s, when Mitchell updated his work (Mitchell 1972), THE NOTION OF A GLOBAL COOLING TREND WAS WIDELY ACCEPTED, albeit poorly understood”
Of course, none of the warmists (truly deniers of history, that lot..) will ever accept that GLOBAL COOLING means “global cooling” and WIDELY ACCEPTED means “there was a consensus”.
They’re going to have to refine their memory hole procedure for the next giant scare, either that or come up with something novel.
I like these contradictory statements…