http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
“scenario C assumes a rapid curtailment of trace gas emissions such that the net climate forcing ceases to increase after the year 2000.”
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
“scenario C assumes a rapid curtailment of trace gas emissions such that the net climate forcing ceases to increase after the year 2000.”
Completely off topic… but any chance you have some wind info that could shed light on this (from what seems to be the ‘latest’ on Japan)?
“Japan’s meteorological agency reported one good sign. It said the prevailing wind in the area of the stricken plant was heading east into the Pacific, which would help carry away any radiation.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110315/as-japan-earthquake-nuclear-crisis/
“scenario C assumes a rapid curtailment of trace gas emissions such that the net climate forcing ceases to increase after the year 2000.” – James Hansen, doomsday soothsayer who keeps getting it wrong.
Unfortunately Hansen’s GISS fantasy data set can’t be trusted since it has been shown to use statistical data fabrication fraud to insert a warming bias of +2c to +4c.
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/starving-eagles-fall-from-sky-in-canada/?iref=obinsite
EAGLES DYING FROM COLD!!!!!!!!!!!
Call Silent Spring to save them!
Well done! We’ve curtailed our emissions!… Haven’t we?
The more you look at the alarmist’s track record, the more wretched it seems.