Gore has wanted to get even with the US since his chads gut hung, but nature just won’t cooperate.
h/t to TinyCO2
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
I wonder if Gore will admit he was wrong about this?
I just don’t trust people who won’t admit mistakes.
Obsess much?
Earlier today you described this story as “TOTAL BS”
Steve,
there must be some other Tony/ I never said this story was BS.
As I recall I was considering the possibility that a travel reporter might not have all the pertinent information to make conclusions about anything related to climate change
I copied and pasted your exact capital letters
Steve,
that is very funny.
In my comment I was agreeing with Sunsettomy that what I wrote was B.S. Because of COURSE we should believe travel tourism reporters over any sort of science.
my you have a short memory.
Obviously the travel reporter was correct, and your religion was blasphemed.
I like how they adjust the prediction: “New studies indicate….several more decades”. Oops! Old crystal ball no good! New, better crystal ball, good!
Kilamanjaro’s ice cap was observed to be dwindling since the 1880s.
Kilimanjaro’s vanishing ice due to tree-felling
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.08.001
“the famed snowcap is stubbornly….”
Do models factor in “stubborness”?
We have said all along that the science is settled, sometimes we have to adjust our predictions forward several decades because they don’t happen. You deniers like to twist these necessary recomputations from model adjustments as ‘moving the goal posts.’ It is unfair to consider it as such, because our previously settled science of AGW meaning less snow has now been slightly updated to AGW means more snow, so thus we have all along said that the snow would not disappear from Kilimanjaro because AGW causes more snow, as well as that the snow will disappear from Kilimanjaro as AGW causes less snow. Either scenario is not inconsistant with AGW. Thank you.