Gore has wanted to get even with the US since his chads gut hung, but nature just won’t cooperate.
h/t to TinyCO2
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
I wonder if Gore will admit he was wrong about this?
I just don’t trust people who won’t admit mistakes.
Obsess much?
Earlier today you described this story as “TOTAL BS”
Steve,
there must be some other Tony/ I never said this story was BS.
As I recall I was considering the possibility that a travel reporter might not have all the pertinent information to make conclusions about anything related to climate change
I copied and pasted your exact capital letters
Steve,
that is very funny.
In my comment I was agreeing with Sunsettomy that what I wrote was B.S. Because of COURSE we should believe travel tourism reporters over any sort of science.
my you have a short memory.
Obviously the travel reporter was correct, and your religion was blasphemed.
I like how they adjust the prediction: “New studies indicate….several more decades”. Oops! Old crystal ball no good! New, better crystal ball, good!
Kilamanjaro’s ice cap was observed to be dwindling since the 1880s.
Kilimanjaro’s vanishing ice due to tree-felling
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.08.001
“the famed snowcap is stubbornly….”
Do models factor in “stubborness”?
We have said all along that the science is settled, sometimes we have to adjust our predictions forward several decades because they don’t happen. You deniers like to twist these necessary recomputations from model adjustments as ‘moving the goal posts.’ It is unfair to consider it as such, because our previously settled science of AGW meaning less snow has now been slightly updated to AGW means more snow, so thus we have all along said that the snow would not disappear from Kilimanjaro because AGW causes more snow, as well as that the snow will disappear from Kilimanjaro as AGW causes less snow. Either scenario is not inconsistant with AGW. Thank you.