Tuesday’s hearing heard from four recognised climate scientists as well as three well-known climate sceptics.
The scientists came armed with the latest evidence on how climate change was raising the dangers of flooding in Europe and wildfires in the US.
Knute Nadelhoffer, a University of Michigan professor, noted that Lake Superior had already warmed by 4.5F since 1979, and that similar trends were visible in smaller lakes.
Witnesses invited by Republicans tried to compare their cause to that of famous dissenters – such as Galileo – who were eventually proved right.
Too bad the skeptics aren’t real scientists.
John R. Christy, B.A. Mathematics, California State University (1973), M.S. Atmospheric Science, University of Illinois (1984), Ph.D. Atmospheric Science, University of Illinois (1987), NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal (1991), American Meteorological Society’s Special Award (1996), Member, Committee on Earth Studies, Space Studies Board (1998-2001), Alabama State Climatologist (2000-Present), Fellow, American Meteorological Society (2002), Panel Member, Official Statement on Climate Change, American Geophysical Union (2003), Member, Committee on Environmental Satellite Data Utilization, Space Studies Board (2003-2004), Member, Committee on Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the last 2,000 years, National Research Council (2006), Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville (1991-Present), Director of the Earth System Science Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville (2000-Present), Contributor, IPCC (1992, 1994, 1996, 2007), Lead Author, IPCC (2001)
Patrick J. Michaels, A.B. Biological Sciences, University of Chicago (1971), S.M. Biology, University of Chicago (1975), Ph.D. Ecological Climatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison (1979), Research and Project Assistant, Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin (1976-1979), Assistant Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia (1980-1986), Virginia State Climatologist (1980-2007), President, Central Virginia Chapter, American Meteorological Society (1986-1987), Executive Board, American Association of State Climatologists (1986-1989), Associate Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia (1986-1995), President, American Association of State Climatologists (1987-1988), Chair, Committee on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society (1988-1999), Senior Fellow in Environmental Studies, Cato Institute (1992-Present), Visiting Scientist, Marshall Institute (1996-Present), Member, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Member, Association of American Geographers, Member, Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society, Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia (1996-Present), Contributor and Expert Reviewer, IPCC (1990, 1992, 1995, 2001, 2007)
Richard S. Lindzen, A.B. Physics Magna Cum Laude, Harvard University (1960), S.M. Applied Mathematics, Harvard University (1961), Ph.D. Applied Mathematics, Harvard University (1964), Research Associate in Meteorology, University of Washington (1964-1965), NATO Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Institute for Theoretical Meteorology, University of Oslo (1965-1966), Research Scientist, National Center for Atmospheric Research (1966-1967), Visiting Lecturer in Meteorology, UCLA (1967), NCAR Outstanding Publication Award (1967), AMS Meisinger Award (1968), Associate Professor and Professor of Meteorology, University of Chicago (1968-1972), Summer Lecturer, NCAR Colloquium (1968, 1972, 1978), AGU Macelwane Award (1969), Visiting Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Tel Aviv University (1969), Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship (1970-1976), Gordon McKay Professor of Dynamic Meteorology, Harvard University (1972-1983), Visiting Professor of Dynamic Meteorology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1975), Lady Davis Visiting Professor, Department of Meteorology, The Hebrew University (1979), Director, Center for Earth and Planetary Physics, Harvard University (1980-1983), Robert P. Burden Professor of Dynamical Meteorology, Harvard University (1982-1983), AMS Charney Award (1985), Vikram Amblal Sarabhai Professor, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India (1985), Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Fellowship (1986-1987), Distinguished Visiting Scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA (1988-Present), Sackler Visiting Professor, Tel Aviv University (1992), Landsdowne Lecturer, University of Victoria (1993), Bernhard Haurwitz Memorial Lecturer, American Meteorological Society (1997), Fellow, American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fellow, American Geophysical Union, Fellow, American Meteorological Society, Member, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Member, Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society, Member, National Academy of Sciences, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1983-Present), Lead Author, IPCC (2001)
Roy W. Spencer, B.S. Atmospheric Sciences, University of Michigan (1978), M.S. Meteorology, University of Wisconsin (1980), Ph.D. Meteorology, University of Wisconsin (1982), Research Scientist, Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin (1982-1984), Senior Scientist for Climate Studies, Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA (1984-2001), MSFC Center Director’s Commendation (1989), U.S. Team Leader, Multichannel Imaging Microwave Radiometer (MIMR) Team, NASA (1992-Present), Team Leader, AMSR-E Science Team, NASA (1994-Present), NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal (1991), American Meteorological Society’s Special Award (1996), Principal Research Scientist, Earth System Science Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville (2001-Present)
I don’t think Michaels, Lindzen or Spencer were there. I haven’t seen any testimony, or comments saying that Christie or Pilke are not a qualified climate scientists
It does not invalidate the fact that the Grauniad’s article was hopelessly biased as usual.
Still as so few people read it it does not really matter too much.
If you want to make the longest post you’ve ever had list all their peer reviewed works too, especially Richard Lindzen’s.
Christy smoked them.
“The non-falsifiable hypotheses works this way, “whatever happens is consistent with my hypothesis.” In other words, there is no event that would “falsify” the hypothesis. As such, these assertions cannot be considered science or in anyway informative since the hypothesis’ fundamental prediction is “anything may happen.” In the example above if winters become milder or they become snowier, the hypothesis stands. This is not science.
As noted above, there are innumerable types of events that can be defined as
extreme events – so for the enterprising individual (unencumbered by the scientific method), weather statistics can supply an almost unlimited set of targets in which to discover a “useful” extreme event. Thus, when such an individual observes an unusual event, it may be tempting to define it as a once-for-all extreme metric to “prove” a point about climate change.”
He later goes on to show that more record cold temps have occurred recently than warm. Later, he gives a scathing critique of “consensus science”…..“The term “consensus science” will often be appealed to in arguments about climate change. This is a form of “argument from authority.” Consensus, however, is a political notion, not a scientific notion.”……“We do not have laboratory methods of testing our hypotheses as many other sciences do. As a result, opinion, arguments from authority, dramatic press releases, and notions of consensus tend to pass for science in our field when they should not.”
He then goes on to show how ludicrous it is to consider de-carbonizing the U.S.
Where did you get that? See it’s interesting to hear Christy going at them hammer and tong, but I’m more interested in what the Democrat’s “experts” presented as evidence.
We got two days of warmist bullshit on congressional record. Time to take a shovel to that load is what I’m thinking.
http://judithcurry.com/2011/03/08/extreme-testimony/
paper, you can go here,
http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=8304
to get the written testimony of the witnesses. The alarmists as you can imagine didn’t have anything new to say nor was the approach novel. It was simply, “we all agree that bad things will happen and you should believe us, because we all agree.”
Roberts created a stir. But I think he went a bit off message.
Pielke Sr. was, well, Pielke Sr……
Brilliant smackdown of the alarmist movement
TonyD once said he would stop believing in AGW if there were more cold records than hot ones, I’m guessing we have a convert? Or goal post mover….
Of course I am a convert. One winter obviously proves AGW is a fraud. EVERY scientist knows that. Those alarmists whackos have always said temps will increase every year exactly in line with increase in CO2 and there are no other factors that affect climate. Steve has said that over and over again, so it must be true
Winters have been cooling since 1990, but feel free to keep your head buried. http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/helping-tamino-out-with-his-snow-job/
Steve,
I think Hansen said the ice caps will reach my house by 2008! Or was that from an article no one bothered to verify?
Living in the UP of Michigan I have often been in Lake Superior and have not noticed any increase in temperature. But then again going from 33 F to 37.5 F still causes shrinkage so maybe I wouldn’t notice.
Their was an episode on Seinfeld about shrinkage, where Kramer went into the cold water, his girl friend observed `shrinkage’ when he came out of the water and immediately bolted. 🙂
Sounds like Phil is in favor of global warming, especially when girls are around.
Me too!
When you get over 50 you need help from all possible sources 🙂
I thought in 2007 Gav suggested that the climate guys were CSI sleuths. Did they become scientists recently? Thir science seems telegraph that.
Wow. Lake Superior is warming 3 times as fast as the fake warming in the atmosphere! That’s quite an achievement.
Love those comments from Christy. And he delivers them in an emotionless way.
The mentally ill are oblivious to their own condition, so unfortunately, even after CAGW is dead and buried, it will remain viable in the minds of the delusional. Sort of like a child’s secret invisible friend… 🙂
Again, notice they are in love with the year 1979. That was an extremely cold winter. So if it’s warmer than the coldest year, there has to be global warming.
By the same token, if last July in Iowa was not within 4.5 degrees as hot as 1936, there must be catastrophic global cooling.