Romm says CO2 is increasing “super-exponentially“, while Hansen shows greenhouse gases tailing off.
Hansen :
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Is that similar to: supercalifragilisticexpialidocious?
Firefox does not recognize the word but I copied it from a Marry Poppins song book! Joey Boy must have been watching that show thinking it is a real life documentary!
C’mon Mikey, sing along!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-Z0SSyUcw
I thought exponential things were already super. Does this mean they’re super duper?
This climate science is so confusing…
Do you have a reference for the Hansen graph? Is it new or old?
Thanks
Sorry, see it below.
The powers of the Sith Climate Lords are indeed powerful as they command CO2 to do as they wish.
The rise of CO2 is fundamental to the (not good) CAGW theory. If Scenario B is the route, then all those others drop off immediately. Then we only have to show that Scenario B doesn’t lead to massive temp increases as per Scenario B. Which is true.
Very important observation. Haven’t seen it before.
Note the condescenting tone of the article, implying that you have to be old enough to see the difference, which in turn implies that climate takes a long time to change.
Old enough to remember the dust bowl. Then you would know for sure that Hansen has no idea what he is talking about.