Romm says CO2 is increasing “super-exponentially“, while Hansen shows greenhouse gases tailing off.
Hansen :
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
Is that similar to: supercalifragilisticexpialidocious?
Firefox does not recognize the word but I copied it from a Marry Poppins song book! Joey Boy must have been watching that show thinking it is a real life documentary!
C’mon Mikey, sing along!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-Z0SSyUcw
I thought exponential things were already super. Does this mean they’re super duper?
This climate science is so confusing…
Do you have a reference for the Hansen graph? Is it new or old?
Thanks
Sorry, see it below.
The powers of the Sith Climate Lords are indeed powerful as they command CO2 to do as they wish.
The rise of CO2 is fundamental to the (not good) CAGW theory. If Scenario B is the route, then all those others drop off immediately. Then we only have to show that Scenario B doesn’t lead to massive temp increases as per Scenario B. Which is true.
Very important observation. Haven’t seen it before.
Note the condescenting tone of the article, implying that you have to be old enough to see the difference, which in turn implies that climate takes a long time to change.
Old enough to remember the dust bowl. Then you would know for sure that Hansen has no idea what he is talking about.