Romm says CO2 is increasing “super-exponentially“, while Hansen shows greenhouse gases tailing off.
Hansen :
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Is that similar to: supercalifragilisticexpialidocious?
Firefox does not recognize the word but I copied it from a Marry Poppins song book! Joey Boy must have been watching that show thinking it is a real life documentary!
C’mon Mikey, sing along!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-Z0SSyUcw
I thought exponential things were already super. Does this mean they’re super duper?
This climate science is so confusing…
Do you have a reference for the Hansen graph? Is it new or old?
Thanks
Sorry, see it below.
The powers of the Sith Climate Lords are indeed powerful as they command CO2 to do as they wish.
The rise of CO2 is fundamental to the (not good) CAGW theory. If Scenario B is the route, then all those others drop off immediately. Then we only have to show that Scenario B doesn’t lead to massive temp increases as per Scenario B. Which is true.
Very important observation. Haven’t seen it before.
Note the condescenting tone of the article, implying that you have to be old enough to see the difference, which in turn implies that climate takes a long time to change.
Old enough to remember the dust bowl. Then you would know for sure that Hansen has no idea what he is talking about.