Romm says CO2 is increasing “super-exponentially“, while Hansen shows greenhouse gases tailing off.
Hansen :
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
Recent Comments
- arn on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Gordon Vigurs on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Gordon Vigurs on AI Climate Math
- Greg in NZ on AI Math
- Greg in NZ on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- conrad ziefle on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Peter Carroll on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Peter Carroll on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
Is that similar to: supercalifragilisticexpialidocious?
Firefox does not recognize the word but I copied it from a Marry Poppins song book! Joey Boy must have been watching that show thinking it is a real life documentary!
C’mon Mikey, sing along!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-Z0SSyUcw
I thought exponential things were already super. Does this mean they’re super duper?
This climate science is so confusing…
Do you have a reference for the Hansen graph? Is it new or old?
Thanks
Sorry, see it below.
The powers of the Sith Climate Lords are indeed powerful as they command CO2 to do as they wish.
The rise of CO2 is fundamental to the (not good) CAGW theory. If Scenario B is the route, then all those others drop off immediately. Then we only have to show that Scenario B doesn’t lead to massive temp increases as per Scenario B. Which is true.
Very important observation. Haven’t seen it before.
Note the condescenting tone of the article, implying that you have to be old enough to see the difference, which in turn implies that climate takes a long time to change.
Old enough to remember the dust bowl. Then you would know for sure that Hansen has no idea what he is talking about.