http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/118542279.html
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
before they take these pictures, do they tell the makeup artist “make me look like a smug little pri*k”
No, he sort of looks like he is becoming a Conehead. If anyone remembers SNL.
His reputation precedes him and any claim he makes you could bet the opposite is true! The decline in one type of temperature proxies did not match the incline in another type of manufactured temperature proxies! Because Apples do not taste like Oranges you can not compare them even if sometimes the size is consistent and statistically the weight may even tend in the same direction for a while. The size and weight of an Orange does not tell you how the Apple crop will do this year.
That is what they are, or were trying to do, with the Climatology reports.