The credo of climate alarmism.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
And, it is amazingly effective.
It’s not a lie if a climate model predicts it…….at least that is way things work these days.
Exactly. Another amazing aspect of the climate discussion is the models themselves. Our scientists seem to think, or at least wish us to believe, that the models are some sort of Artificial Intelligence.
When a scientist says our model predicts X, I’m driven mad! The model did no such thing. It simply regurgitates an answer it was programmed to regurgitate.
They just keep digging LOL
Wait….it IS a surefire way to be right, at some point. Not even an astrologer can be wrong every single time.
Think of that poor guy in the early 1990s predicting the stock market would crash at 5,000, then at 6,000, then at 7,000 etc etc: well, one day it really crashed, and am sure there is somebody out there thinking he’s an infallible predictor of what happens to the stock market.
Yeh, I get a kick out the “market gurus”. When ever I see one on TV or get an add of some sort, my question is, are they doing at least as well as Warren Buffet?
The trick to the market is anticipating where the mega rich are going to put their money, and then anticipating when they’re going to move it again.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Joseph Goebbels
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”
Adolf Hitler
Lots of long noses out there getting even longer by the minute.
Re: (Mar 25 18:09),
Keep referring to the motto of this site; Feynman: “Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts.” And the models are “projections” of the opinions of truly ignorant experts.
So far, they’re doing a fine job of demonstrating said ignorance!