Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
Recent Comments
- dm on UN Is Upset
- dm on UK Green Energy Record
- Francis Barnett on UK Green Energy Record
- Greg in NZ on Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Disillusioned on “Fascist Salute”
- Francis Barnett on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
January 1974 : Brisbane Recieved 34 Inches Of Rain – Almost 300% Of What It Received This year
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Ah but who peer reviewed it?
There is probably a peer reviewed Monthly Weather summary for Australia, like for the US and UK, but I doubt if anyone would question the official measurement, although it does happen arouind here in DC with Reagan National Airport, because their snowfall always comes in 20-30% less than the other major stations, BWI and Dulles.
Here’s the “peer review”.
Check out the photos of the 1974 flood level markers in this article:
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2010/11/29/3079400.htm
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?