And yet we survived. In 2010, any trace amount of radiation will destroy the planet.
See anything interesting about the temperature record while atmospheric testing was going on?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
Steven! Now they’ll say that nuclear bombs are good for the planet …
oh wait…
So if global warming ever becomes a problem, just set off some nukes. Sounds simple enough. It has been done before and can be done again.
lol, if I’m not mistaken, the idea was posited last month.
Global brightening, dimming and then brightening again.
There is evidence of sunshine hours going up and down and up again in a similar fashion.
I think much of the brightening occurred as air quality improved. But you may be right that atmospheric testing kicked up some dust.
We could just use more hair spray……………
….and mirrored balls
Yeh!!!!! Bring back disco!!!!!!
I….I….I’m stayin alive……I……I….I’m stayin alive!
good Lord…
…we really were separated at birth!
lmao!
Pingback: Greens fear nukes, Moonbat fears lack of them | JunkScience Sidebar
Hang on… are you saying we can explain the dip in temperatures during that period through global dimming caused by nuke tests? If so, doesn’t that mean the ‘consensus’ is right on global warming?
No. If you remove the cooling from 1945 to 1965, the warming from 1970 to 2000 is greatly reduced.
So why is it cooling at the top of the graph without the nuke tests and CO2 levels have still been rising? What? Nothing to do with CO2? Don’t believe you!
lol, yeh, weird isn’t it?
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:2001.17/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:2001.17/trend
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/from:2001.17/plot/esrl-co2/from:2001.17/trend
http://suyts.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/image.png