Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
There’s plenty of peer-reviewed climate science out there that says the truth is we’re having little to no effect. Thanks for clearing that up, Joe.
Bla bla bla climate bla fricken bla!
It’s all about “curbing energy demand” by humans, and there is only one way for that to happen!
I can think of two ways; one is a lot meaner than the other. Think Logan’s Run.
Romm first. If it comes to that.
Oh and Gore second.
Anything A Climatologist Says Is Unequivocally True
Good.Then Lindzen is right.
Weird, the conversation could have been over long ago if we’d just known this!