Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Robertvd on Gaslighting 1924
Tricky. Increases in per capita energy and electricity use does improve life when the starting point is low. More developed countries can and do increase their GDP and reduce their per capita energy use because they shift from industrial economies to more service based ones. So it all depends on which country you are talking about, which I’m sure Romm does not explain.
Anyhow, good experiment in Japan right now to see how reduced energy supplies help them achieve a new state of green bliss.