http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2011/03/25/3173653.htm
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Mike Peinsipp on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Robertvd on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- arn on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis


Tim Flannery his best mate said that the temperature won’t cool for 1000 years even if we act http://www.mtr1377.com.au/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=8273
I guess if we wait 1000 years eventually an Ice Age will happen!!!
Another puppet. Where do they all come from, is there no one in the Obama administration with just a trace of scruples? The lure of pelf and power is universal.
“Why I think climate change is real.”
Did I read that right?
He’s moved down from believe to think?
We’re going to wreck the economy based on what an economist imbecile thinks??
Garnaut is no puppet. He’s is the Australian Governments chief adviser on the climate change agenda. His portfolio is actually economics and has no earth or physics oriented qualifications. Besides the fact that he is an activist zealot.
Yes, all 77 of them agree.
Just because someone is an acclaimed politician, economist or financier doesn’t mean his or her view on climate change is what we should all believe. In fact quite the contrary we should be very weary when they are the ones giving such talk as its usually based on ulterior motive than on a real science.