http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2011/03/25/3173653.htm
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- JohnFrancis on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Louis Hooffstetter on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Billyjack on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- arn on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Robertvd on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014


Tim Flannery his best mate said that the temperature won’t cool for 1000 years even if we act http://www.mtr1377.com.au/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=8273
I guess if we wait 1000 years eventually an Ice Age will happen!!!
Another puppet. Where do they all come from, is there no one in the Obama administration with just a trace of scruples? The lure of pelf and power is universal.
“Why I think climate change is real.”
Did I read that right?
He’s moved down from believe to think?
We’re going to wreck the economy based on what an economist imbecile thinks??
Garnaut is no puppet. He’s is the Australian Governments chief adviser on the climate change agenda. His portfolio is actually economics and has no earth or physics oriented qualifications. Besides the fact that he is an activist zealot.
Yes, all 77 of them agree.
Just because someone is an acclaimed politician, economist or financier doesn’t mean his or her view on climate change is what we should all believe. In fact quite the contrary we should be very weary when they are the ones giving such talk as its usually based on ulterior motive than on a real science.