http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=global-warning-as-paris-b
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Bob G on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Allan Shelton on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Gordon Vigurs on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Fred Harwood on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- arn on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
Here’s some real science that isn’t bleak and dire, but is better than we thought:
Study: Staring at breasts increases heart health
“Authors of the study recommend that men stare at breasts for ten minutes a day.”
important video of this vital study
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh-IsL_D2vU
Wonder how the blooming is going this year in the snow LOL
Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
March 6, 2011 at 3:39 am
I’m skeptical, I believe this needs MUCH more research. I would be willing to volunteer my participation so as to get to the bottom of this!
Strange that they didn’t mention early blooms in Paris in the 1930’s (and probably at many other times). I wonder why that is?
In any event, early blooms in 2007 or at any other time doesn’t mean humans are causing it, either.
Yes, because an average of a few tenths of a degree cause flowers to bloom so early everywhere.
Weather vs climate, over and over and over and over and over again!
-Scott
During the Minoan warming when temperature were a few degrees warmer did the flowers bloom all year round?
So, in 1971 we had two weeks in January of 70 deg F weather and the cherry trees went into full bloom, as did the daffodils. Then winter came back.
I learned that cherry trees have secondary buds. When Spring came, the cherry trees bloomed all over again. Nature is so cool. It’s been there before and taken care of the variations that can and do occur.
If this kind of weather had not happened many times before, these plants would not have developed these survival strategies. That’s evolution in action, adapting to the environment.
I forgot to mention that flowers also bloom earlier in the Spring with higher CO2. There does not have to be earlier warm weather.
The accounts of blooming in England two weeks early, before the winters went Postal, can be accounted for by the CO2, which is good because there is no record of there being any warming.
Dated 2008. Three years sure go be fast!
When the blossoms don’t bloom, it’s due to warmcold, which again is caused by Republicans. So whether they bloom or don’t bloom, it’s all their fault!