Scientific American : “Ten possibilities for staving off catastrophic climate change”

    1. Forego Fossil Fuels
    2. Infrastructure Upgrade
    3. Move Closer to Work
    4. Consume Less
    5. Be Efficient
    6. Go Vegetarian
    7. Stop Cutting Down Trees
    8. Unplug
    9. One Child
    10. Future Fuels— ethanol derived from crops
    11. Experiment Earth

      http://www.scientificamerican.com/

      They should do all those things – and live in caves. They should also learn to count.

      About Tony Heller

      Just having fun
      This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

      12 Responses to Scientific American : “Ten possibilities for staving off catastrophic climate change”

      1. R. de Haan says:

        And build better nuclear plants.
        Reactor Design in Japan Has Long Been Questioned
        http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/world/asia/16contain.html?_r=2

      2. Dave N says:

        Counting 11 as 10 is consistent with AGW alarmism

        • Mike Davis says:

          That is before it has been properly homogenized! The number could be as high as 25 with an error range of 30! but we will not know until it has been audited by 40 “Independent” auditing groups. Then we will need to take the average of the outcomes to realize the best guess of possibilities.
          Eight and nine are supposed to be all on one line: Unplug one child!
          I am waiting for the author to take the lead as well as the publishing group!

      3. suyts says:

        AHAHAAHHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!!! For realz!?! To the 10/11 things, I say, them first.

      4. bubbagyro says:

        The consensus says that 10 is really eleven. The math is settled.

        Scientific American shows its editorial skill once again!

      5. Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group of the German publishing corporation Holtzbrinck. Although it wasn’t part of NPG in 2007 when the article of your link was written, it had been part of Holtzbricnk since 1986, where it was transformed from science to popular media.
        http://www.scientificamerican.com/pressroom/pr/release.cfm?site=sciam&date=2009-10-22

        In 2002 Holtbrinck sold its scientific and educational publishing unit to Elsevier (and kept it’s pseudo-scientific NPG / SA units).

      6. Andy Weiss says:

        Big Brother knows what’s best for us.

      7. Jeff K says:

        I predict a huge die-off within 50 years as developed nations are having fewer children, as it is politically incorrect to have more than two children nowadays.

      Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *