Yet global warming activists do bear some resemblance to their evangelical counterparts in two ways: Both often describe a sort of conversion experience in which they become powerfully convinced of the need for personal change, and once converted they can bring a missionary zeal to spreading the word.
That’s certainly true of Mark Hertsgaard, author of “Hot: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth” (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, $25). His conversion experience happened in 2005 during a reporting trip to London, when he interviewed David King, the chief science advisor to the British government. King pointed out that climate change wasn’t some theoretical future event – it was already happening, and even in 2005 it was too late to stop it.
It so happened that Hertsgaard’s daughter, Chiara, had been born that year, and the discussion with King got him thinking about what kind of world Chiara would grow up in. The book is his response.
And make no mistake, Hertsgaard is a global-warming missionary. At times, his IPCC-assessment-thumping gets a little tiresome even for fellow believers like me, especially the section devoted to refuting the claims of climate deniers. Pointing out that tobacco companies are now being sued for deceptive marketing practices of past decades, he suggests that the fossil fuel industry might similarly be held liable someday for trying to refute the scientific evidence of climate change. That’s quite a stretch; reports from conservative think tanks, fact-free though they may be, aren’t really the same thing as deceptive ads.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/14/2114337/book-review-hot-living-through.html
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- mwhite on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- william on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
The people that need to be held accountable are the members of the Chicken Little Brigade such as the subject of this article and his Mentor King!
Why should we waste time and money on a (non) event that we couldn’t stop even six years ago?
“fossil fuel industry might similarly be held liable someday for trying to refute the scientific evidence of climate change”
So, by the same token, would Hertsgaard agree that he and other CAGW alarmists might be held liable should CAGW turn out to be a crock? Or would he expect that their noble motives would shield them from prosecution for a crime tantamount to shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre.