Vikings Failed To Consult Peer Review

5 Responses to Vikings Failed To Consult Peer Review

1. Andy Weiss says:

   March 13, 2011 at 5:32 pm

   Just another example of natural climate change, which has been happening for the last 4.5 billion years.

   Reply
2. Tony Duncan says:

   March 13, 2011 at 5:34 pm

   Steve,

   and what peer reviewed articles say there was no warming in Greenland during this period?

   Reply
3. Paul H says:

   March 13, 2011 at 7:05 pm

   Funny how some people don’t like being reminded of inconvenient facts.

   Reply
4. vigilantfish says:

   March 14, 2011 at 11:34 pm

   Better check ‘The Melting Arctic’ project funding for evidence of Big Oil contamination. /sarc

   This is good news – further evidence to undermine the Mann Meme that continues to haunt the CAGW debate.

   Reply
5. Alcheson says:

   March 15, 2011 at 4:30 am

   So Tony… you are one of those that claim that IF Greenland was warmer, then it was strictly a local event? I mean, afterall, the whole AGW argument rests on the Hockey Stick representation of temperatures for the past 1000+ years. If the temperature graph in the 1990 IPCC report that shows MWP and the LIA is actually the more accurate (rather than the more recent Hockey Stick), then warming/cooling trends from 1900-2010 are easily shown to be almost all natural in origin.

   Reply