There was no MWP according to our top climate researchers. What were the Vikings thinking of?
http://votumsolvit.com/2008/07/31/viking-hunting-outpost-on-greenland/
h/t to Scarlet Pumpernickel
There was no MWP according to our top climate researchers. What were the Vikings thinking of?
http://votumsolvit.com/2008/07/31/viking-hunting-outpost-on-greenland/
h/t to Scarlet Pumpernickel
Just another example of natural climate change, which has been happening for the last 4.5 billion years.
Steve,
and what peer reviewed articles say there was no warming in Greenland during this period?
Funny how some people don’t like being reminded of inconvenient facts.
Better check ‘The Melting Arctic’ project funding for evidence of Big Oil contamination. /sarc
This is good news – further evidence to undermine the Mann Meme that continues to haunt the CAGW debate.
So Tony… you are one of those that claim that IF Greenland was warmer, then it was strictly a local event? I mean, afterall, the whole AGW argument rests on the Hockey Stick representation of temperatures for the past 1000+ years. If the temperature graph in the 1990 IPCC report that shows MWP and the LIA is actually the more accurate (rather than the more recent Hockey Stick), then warming/cooling trends from 1900-2010 are easily shown to be almost all natural in origin.