Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Terry Shipman on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- JohnFrancis on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Louis Hooffstetter on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Maybe that little prong east of Greenland?
The Arctic seems to be concentrating harder this year..
Maybe the Yearly final exams require more concentration this year because the questions are harder! 😉
Waldo is taking Spring Break in the Bahamas!
What you are showing is part of Western Europe! The Arctic moved! Actually to be consistent Climatology redefined “Arctic Region” to now include everything North of 34 N latitude!
If you compare the old region North of 63 to the new region North of 35 you will see that percentage wise there is less ice under the new definition!
You’re right. Virtually the entire North Atlantic Ocean is ice free!!! That’s bound to cause a catastrophic rise in the sea level sooner or later.
Concentrated purple haze all in my eyes.
Good representation of the lack of ice on the Pacific side.
The snow cover representation seems to be nibbling into the sea ice part in some areas, such as the eastern Baltic and near Murmansk. They ought to remove the snow so it’s a better match, otherwise the amount of sea ice seems to be less than it is at first glance. Any reason why you shouldn’t take these images as little more than a “fun guide”
Andy
ZZZZzzzz……….
Any reason to believe following sea ice at all is little more than fun stuff?
If you are interested in facts on global warming, don’t miss:
http://www.globaltempfacts.com