Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- GW on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
Ooops, that’s gotta hurt!…http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png
Patrick channels Serreze.
Thanks for posting that Steve, made me laugh. I chuckled when he wrote :-
************
2010:
Many hottest weather records are broken in northern hemisphere.
Summer arctic ice at record low in extent.
By September the Arctic Ocean is freely navigable by both the northern sea route and the north west passage.
2011:
Reduced ice cover affects sea temperatures, in turn affecting Arctic current flows and air movements. Thinner ice, instead of piling up as pressure ridges due to compression effects, cracks into sections due to tension and agitation effects.
The Arctic is virtually ice-free by late summer: there is open water at the North Pole.
The fact of being broadly correct in most of my predictions during 2010 does not mean that I will be proven correct this year in the above and the following predictions for 2011. But I respectfully submit that my successes make my 2011 forecasts more worthy of serious scientific discussion.
******************
How does he mean broadly correct, he had two statements about the Arctic and only one was correct, that’s 50%! Half right and he is going on about his successes. I’m sure these people delude themselves.
His guesses for this year will be well out, must bookmark this for later this year.
Andy
And the North Pole must have been ice free in 2008