Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
Climate Science Was Considerably Brighter 100 Years Ago
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
It was the CO2 that dunnit, I tells ya!!
yeah, what happens is, after the snowfall the concentration of CO2 skyrockets, so the air gets much warmer.
See? Al Gore was right, and his pal Charles (Windsor, or Manson) too!
One could imagine how this effect be involved in moving from 0mm to 30mm of sea level water into snow and ice in Greenland, however as this is science how would we measure if that has actually happened and to what extent and where (on the planet)?
One would think that the movement of 3cm of sea level water should show up somehow and some wheres as that’s a huge volume of water (liquid, vapor, snow, ice) considering the full ocean extent?
Hmmm… how much water is 30mm of sea level drop?
Ah, 10,228 cubic kilometers (1.023×10^16 L (liters)) of water got sucked up somewhere. That’s a big drink. Will you have vodka or rum with that, or just some salt and algae?
Assuming the worlds ocean area and uniform sucking across that area.
Wolfram reports the oceans area as (http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=oceans+area) 3.409×10^8 square kilometers or if you prefer, 131.6 million square miles.
So assuming a flat surface for ease of computation, take that area and multiply it by 30mm.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=oceans+area+*+30mm
On a lighter note, the cube root of 10,228 cubic kilometers is 21.71 kilometers on a side (2.5 times the height of Mount Everest and almost the height of Mars Olympus Mons) which would make it a nicely sized very large Borg cube. Just saying. [:)]
On a heavier note that amount of water is approximately 2/1000 of the earths atmospheric mass. Wolfram does interesting comparisons.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=mass+of+%2810%2C228+cubic+kilometers%29+of+water
“~~ ( 0.002 ~~ 1/503 ) × Earth’s atmosphere mass ( 5.1441×10^18 kg )”
That sounds like a noticeable amount of moisture in the atmosphere if it all went there (even for a time). Now will it all flush back into the seas causing a upward rise again this summer?