If we are to retain any hope of keeping sea levels relatively steady, he argues, those power plants will need to be bulldozed over the next few decades.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on New Visitech Features
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Reid on New Visitech Features
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014

OK,
that is TWO Hansen posts in a row without distorting or misquoting him. Who is this and what have you done with Steve Goddard?
You have pictures of him plastered all over the walls of your shri- errr, living room, don’t you?
You are an amazing maroon…….
Hansen is such a political hack.
And, of course, all this assumes Manhattan is worth saving.
Hansen should be more concerned about suitcase bombs on Manhattan that coal powered electricity plants.
Perhaps we can get Jim to sit aboard one of those bombs to make his point?
I would like to recommend Sacramento as ground zero.
The frst step in saving the planet would be to disconnect NASA GISS from the power grid followed by NOAA and EPA. Not only would we be reducing the carbon foot print but eliminating the source of the detrimental warming!
What hubris.
These people who think man has that kind of power are the same ones who devalue human life. It boggles the mind.