Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
They are living in denial.
In 10 years time the above article might be referenced by skeptics just as “snowfalls are now just a thing of the past.”
Ya, there sure are human fingerprints all over it. Take a look at all them over the GISTemp adjustments.
Steve,
I may be wrong, but according to my (admittedly weak) math skills, 2001-2011 is not white 25 years.
I do love how you sometimes highlight the actual part of a link that limits the point of your posts, however.
This is really complicated Tony. If the second half of a period has a negative slope, is the trend showing an “increasing rate of warming?”
Steve,
this is a newspaper article. If you want to show the slope from various measured sources from over the past 25 years you could do so.
If you want to only show information that supports your ideology, you can continue to only post information that reinforces that.
You could also point out that all sources show increased temperature change in the last 25 years, and question whether the last 10 might indicate that the rate is not in fact increasing.
On he other hand you could show that there are certain proxy records that actually show the temp has declined at an increasing rate over the last 25 years. There are many other options open to you as well
“increased temperature change”
Nonsense. That is the second derivative – which is clearly negative from the HadCRUT graph. You really have no idea what you are saying.