Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
- Mike on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Timo, not that one! on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Bill on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Mission Accomplished
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
Something is not calibrated right….
It’s showing a positive anomaly around south Florida and the Keys.
Monitoring water temps is one of the things we do.
We have been below normal all year, and were below normal yesterday too.
Average 1.8 below for the month.
Did you remember to add the Hansenian factor?
I think the map was specifically for yesterday. How does that square with your observations?
we have 9 stations oceanside between the Dry Tortugas and Miami…
All 9 were below yesterday and have been below all year…..
We using probes, so they drift high.
If anything, our direct measurements will be higher, not lower.
Lol, then it is indeed, the Hansenian factor you forgot to add.
Seriously though, like most of these sites, it is almost impossible to find the data source. They mention observed temps and sat. data, but I can’t find what they use where. I’m guessing an extrapolating technique is involved.
ok, they’ve got something major screwed up here….
Go back to their SST for the middle of Feb.
They show a huge pool of cold water off the west coast of Fla.
Tampa area.
That pool of cold water is just now moving around us here.
There are three huge pools of shallow water down here, Florida Bay, Biscayne Bay, and the Everglades. But they only show that kind of heating in still air, the winds been out of the E at 15-20 all week.
It’s impossible for that to be the source right now.
I think the positive anomaly they are showing is some computer glitch, and instead of a + 3, it’s really a – 3.
-3 is right where our measurements are…..
Great. Now Trenberth can devote all of his time to more important things like making up stuff about hurricanes.
+3, -3, was it Steig or Mann who said sign wasn’t important? 🙂