Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
Recent Comments
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- Robert Austin on The End Of Everything
- czechlist on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on The End Of Everything
- Gamecock on The End Of Everything
- Richard E Fritz on “falsely labeling”
- Richard E Fritz on Election Results
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Everything
- Richard E Fritz on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Reid on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
mine too!
Steve do some sleuthing for me when you have a minute…
Almost all of the Arctic ice loss is in the Barents Sea.
This past year they discovered oil and gas there and have been running ice breakers all winter.
See if you can find what the predominate winds were?
I’m sure it blew it all out and that’s why it’s low.
This is going to be the new normal for Barents from now on.
Watch and see if it doesn’t make Arctic ice extent low every year.
I think it was actually due to warm temperatures and southerly winds which compacted the ice.
Well, that blows my theory….
They were running ice breakers in and out of there every day. I’m sure busting it up like that didn’t help.
would that be a path for cyclist! sweet!
A guy could find cycling buddies in a hurry too!
If we ever get rid of the snow up here, I can get my bike out again(actually took it out of the basement and started getting it ready for another season) when we had 2 weekends in a row with CAGW of 15-20 cm each time…followed by scorching temps of about -10C and highs of +2C….
..but not to complain… ok i am…
Usefully flat.
At least the bike paths are separated from the main road, thus bicyclists and motorists don’t get in each other’s way (like they do here in DC). Someone used a little common sense for a change. Probably saved some lives in the process and actually did something to encourage people to bike.
Hi Steve, am just recovering right now from a nice afternoon jaunt on my road bike, in the rain!
I was riding in the rain last night. Today we are having another “hurricane.”
Bike paths on BOTH sides of the highway. COOL!
Though I like the evidence that bicycles are just as lazy as humans, they too want to be driven everywhere by car if they can get away with it.