Global warming demands action
Politics aside, there is no scientific debate about global climate change. It’s happening, and coastal regions face the greatest danger in years to come.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
The usual pseudo-intellectual arrogance on display. These media types don’t know jack about science. They are mindlessly parroting the Pravda party line.
The Chicken Little Brigade and the Memorex echo chamber!
Climate is long term Changing WEATHER Patterns! For Climate to CHANGE the long term Weather patterns would have to become STABLE as that is the only condition now available for Climate to CHANGE to.
If CLIMATE is CHANGE it can not be changing!
They are correct there is nothing to debate as it would be like debating how much the Easter Bunny weighs or the color of its fur. Climate Change is a fantasy!
If it’s in the Connecticut Post, it must be true.
Or not. This is why the so-called global warming crisis represents far more than just contradictions within climate assessments, it showcases how the mainstream media has not been doing their fundamental job of questioning assertions that contain a virtual sea of red flags, when any responsible reporter actually digs into them.
Funny how the MSM can’t figure out why public polls show ever-increasing amounts of people who are less and less concerned about AGW. But remember, we outnumber them, and one day our numbers will force the MSM to explain why they dismiss all these skeptic assessments out-of-hand. And when they are unable to come up with plausible explanations for what has long been journalistic malfeasance, then their whole industry ends up on the verge of total collapse.
I don’t know about your side of the water, but over here in the UK the MSM lost all journalistic credibility many years ago long before global warming took off.
It simply became too easy to cut and paste press handouts whilst concentrating on which popstar was shagging which footballer. Perhaps the readership has been so dumbed down that they can get away with it now.
Fortunately, but not for them, the internet has taken the initiative from them. If you want proper investigative journalism you don’t waste money buying a newspaper now.