Global warming demands action
Politics aside, there is no scientific debate about global climate change. It’s happening, and coastal regions face the greatest danger in years to come.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
- Tough Times For Eco-Terrorists
- EV Mandates
- “Oswald is a patsy. They set him up”
- In This House We Believe In Science
- “BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- conrad ziefle on Net Zero In China
- william on Make America Healthy Again
- arn on Make America Healthy Again
- Gerald Machnee on Grok Defending Climategate
- dearieme on Nobel Prophecy Update
- Russell Cook on Make America Healthy Again
- Allan Shelton on Make America Healthy Again
- Bill Odom on Net Zero In China
The usual pseudo-intellectual arrogance on display. These media types don’t know jack about science. They are mindlessly parroting the Pravda party line.
The Chicken Little Brigade and the Memorex echo chamber!
Climate is long term Changing WEATHER Patterns! For Climate to CHANGE the long term Weather patterns would have to become STABLE as that is the only condition now available for Climate to CHANGE to.
If CLIMATE is CHANGE it can not be changing!
They are correct there is nothing to debate as it would be like debating how much the Easter Bunny weighs or the color of its fur. Climate Change is a fantasy!
If it’s in the Connecticut Post, it must be true.
Or not. This is why the so-called global warming crisis represents far more than just contradictions within climate assessments, it showcases how the mainstream media has not been doing their fundamental job of questioning assertions that contain a virtual sea of red flags, when any responsible reporter actually digs into them.
Funny how the MSM can’t figure out why public polls show ever-increasing amounts of people who are less and less concerned about AGW. But remember, we outnumber them, and one day our numbers will force the MSM to explain why they dismiss all these skeptic assessments out-of-hand. And when they are unable to come up with plausible explanations for what has long been journalistic malfeasance, then their whole industry ends up on the verge of total collapse.
I don’t know about your side of the water, but over here in the UK the MSM lost all journalistic credibility many years ago long before global warming took off.
It simply became too easy to cut and paste press handouts whilst concentrating on which popstar was shagging which footballer. Perhaps the readership has been so dumbed down that they can get away with it now.
Fortunately, but not for them, the internet has taken the initiative from them. If you want proper investigative journalism you don’t waste money buying a newspaper now.