The film’s major selling point is cost-effective renewable energy. Coal, which produces the most carbon emissions of any energy source, is heavily relied upon by the energy industry because it is cheap in contrast with the work and expense that go into harnessing wind and solar energies.
But these natural energy sources, the film explains, have the potential to be so profitable in the long run that the upfront expenses could become negligible over time. The people and companies that forge ahead and invest in the green industry have much to gain, the film claimed, and consumers of these alternative energies could also pay less to heat their homes and power their vehicles in the long term
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Greg in NZ on The End Of Everything
- Bob G on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Disillusioned on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Disillusioned on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Mac on The End Of Everything
- czechlist on The End Of Everything
- arn on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Peter Carroll on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- arn on Election Results
WTF!!!!!
No facts required for films any more. Just make shit up and call it a documentary. Just like Brother Al!
“But these natural energy sources, the film explains, have the potential to be so profitable in the long run that the upfront expenses could become negligible over time.”
Excellent; that means banks and other investors will swiftly see the wisdom of making substantial investments in those companies which will develop the new technologies, without asking taxpayers to subsidise them. Everybody wins!
Obama, “under my plan, energy prices will necessarily rise”.
I believe the word he used was “skyrocket”
Is this film as big a POS as it sounds like?
The next job Van Jones creates, which isn’t some kind of federally subsidized internship, will be his first.
In the opening scene, a purple unicorn appears, ridden by a jackalope, who then narrates the film.
Yes, Film makers know all! Go to Mikey Moron for brain surgery, Cameron for home security, Soros for an ethics class!
And don’t forget go to Gore to get rich! (oh wait, that last one is probably accurate – as long as you do not mind lying, cheating and stealing).