It is bound to happen, any century now.
http://news.google.com/newspapers
h/t to Glacierman
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Gordon Vigurs on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Ed on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Walter on Ellen Flees To The UK
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- conrad ziefle on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
It’s interesting that event though the predictions were pretty incredible, they were not calling it certain doom. They just look at like change. We will farm in areas that are now either too cold or too dry. Never called it the greatest challange facing man kind, or a death spiral.
All change is bad. Unless it is Obama change.
Yes, hopeandchange is good.
Steve,
Interesting that 100 years ago he was predicting something not far off from what most scientists predict with his parameters. CO2 at 700-850 PPM for 500-700 years.
Yea, you would think they might have learned something over the last century.
Steve,
they MIGHT learn something if you would publish all your proofs. I get the feeling that very few climate scientists follow your blog.
You might be surprised. This is a clueless anti-science blog and no one is going to admit that they read it.
Tony, Steve’s blog has been visited by several phd’s since it started. Also, its been referenced by several other climate blogs,…… they’re reading it. They might not like it, but they’re reading.
Tony,
Why hasn’t atmospheric CO2 gone to the levels you reference when the emissions have far exceeded what Arrhenius was basing his predictions on?
Glacierman,
glad you are asking an expert. My deeply considered answer after many years of studying all aspects of climate science and 3 ph.d’s in related fields….. Maybe he did not have all the information necessary to understand the key elements of the carbon cycle.
Tony, I think you just made the case that climate science has not progressed in 100 years…………..
They must fine tune the message. Maybe they need a new PR firm to run Real Climate, yea that will surely advance things.
So the greenhouse effect has been known about for some time. Why weren’t people going crazy about it until the 1980’s? Their big chance to force it down our throats was the 1930’s, when it was truly hot at times. But no one thought about it then.
I wonder if there are any other 100 year old theories that can be used to scare people into committing economic suicide?