It is bound to happen, any century now.
http://news.google.com/newspapers
h/t to Glacierman
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
It’s interesting that event though the predictions were pretty incredible, they were not calling it certain doom. They just look at like change. We will farm in areas that are now either too cold or too dry. Never called it the greatest challange facing man kind, or a death spiral.
All change is bad. Unless it is Obama change.
Yes, hopeandchange is good.
Steve,
Interesting that 100 years ago he was predicting something not far off from what most scientists predict with his parameters. CO2 at 700-850 PPM for 500-700 years.
Yea, you would think they might have learned something over the last century.
Steve,
they MIGHT learn something if you would publish all your proofs. I get the feeling that very few climate scientists follow your blog.
You might be surprised. This is a clueless anti-science blog and no one is going to admit that they read it.
Tony, Steve’s blog has been visited by several phd’s since it started. Also, its been referenced by several other climate blogs,…… they’re reading it. They might not like it, but they’re reading.
Tony,
Why hasn’t atmospheric CO2 gone to the levels you reference when the emissions have far exceeded what Arrhenius was basing his predictions on?
Glacierman,
glad you are asking an expert. My deeply considered answer after many years of studying all aspects of climate science and 3 ph.d’s in related fields….. Maybe he did not have all the information necessary to understand the key elements of the carbon cycle.
Tony, I think you just made the case that climate science has not progressed in 100 years…………..
They must fine tune the message. Maybe they need a new PR firm to run Real Climate, yea that will surely advance things.
So the greenhouse effect has been known about for some time. Why weren’t people going crazy about it until the 1980’s? Their big chance to force it down our throats was the 1930’s, when it was truly hot at times. But no one thought about it then.
I wonder if there are any other 100 year old theories that can be used to scare people into committing economic suicide?