Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
At least back then cooling was considered-and is-a negative to the human condition on this planet. Now, everything is upside-down.
Hey Jeff, more than 100 years ago the CO2 warmists thought completely different.
By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind.” (p63) – Das Werden der Welten (1907), English translation: Worlds in the Making (1908), Svante August Arrhenius
BTW- What is the ideal global average temperature of the earth?
Warmer than it is at my place today. Yesterday was within a comfortable range and it is expected to return to Spring weather soon, but not today! 🙁
Why can’t tornadoes be accepted for what they are, a normal springtime happening in much of the US, instead of being tied to every kook’s interpretation of “climate change”. We went nearly 40 years without a huge tornado catastrophe, probably the longest such stretch in the last 150 years. We were way overdue for one.
I think the moral of this story is be careful about getting your science from newsweek. See this article for some debunking: http://aerosol.ucsd.edu/classes/sio217a/sio217afall08-myth1970.pdf
The highlighted text doesn’t support the full headline. Where’s the evidence that says climatologists are linking the tornadoes to cooling? You have highlighted some text but that is merely a weather observation, the link could be made by the journalist for all we know. There is no evidence here to say the link is made by climatologists, just an unsupported headline.
“There is no evidence here to say the link is made by climatologists”
Hengist, back in 1975, the snake oil salesmen circling the public trough didn’t use the self-aggrandizing title of climatologist. It is my understanding that the self-appointed title “climatologist” became fashionable with sandwich boards proclaiming the end is nigh, tin foil hats and the IPCC a few years later.
Paul in Sweden you are just playing with words. Climatologists is in the headline. BTW You are wrong about the use of the word being self aggrandizing , State Climatologists have been appointed since 1954 http://weather.nmsu.edu/USClimat.htm
Now, where is the evidence that climate scientists back in the 1970s connected tornadoes with global cooling, as suggested by the headline? It’s not there, ergo it’s a fallacious posting so perhaps the author could trouble himself to withdraw the posting .
Pingback: Planet’s energy woes – MacDailyNews
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?