Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Philippe Jones on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Dayna on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
95 – Count Em
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
You’ve given the picture, and a link to the picture – which is repititious.
What is the 95?
Who says it’s 95?
If you want me to spread the word – don’t keep it secret.
95 is the official sunspot number.
Yes, the activity is the lowest since modern counting records began, and one of the lowest periods in history (going back to the 1600s or so). This is in amount (number) of sunspots, and the duration of this solar cycle (longer cycle=weaker sun). The sun has been in a weakened state for over two years now, and the prediction by NASA is for a very low peak value to occur in 2012. The peak of this current cycle was supposed to have occurred in early 2010.
Is solar activity still way below normal?
The all knowing government freaks who consider them self’s experts on climate are still saying that La Nina will weaken this year. With a sleeping sun, how do they assume that this will happen? Perhaps under water volcano’s, or will Romm bring out more crayons and force the Pacific to warm up.
Is solar activity still way below normal?
The 10.7 cm flux is a good indication of solar activity
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/f10.gif
Hi Steven,
I count like 9 spots and that is being generous.
It’s really naked.
Has anyone proposed a name for this period ?
I see two an a half sun spots of any significance in this image, Is there a standard to what size the spot has to be before it qualifies as an actual “sunspot”??