Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Two island sink beneath the waves. But it’s not sea level rise even though one idiot tried to claim it but was debunked.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13383182
You know, they’ve talked themselves into so many circles, I think even the mush-minded entitlement babies could see gaping holes in the discussion. What would the teachers teach? That warming equals more and less snow? That a hot arctic generates cold energy in the continents only during the winter? Or how about increased atmospheric CO2 corellates to a cooler earth in the last 13 years or so? Are they going to lie to the students and tell them mosquitoes don’t live in cold areas?
I’m just really curious as to what exactly would they teach. Just about any part of the theory is directly refuted by other alamist claims or reality. (Disclaimer! This was consistant would our model of alarmist behavior all along.)
They should be glad it’s not an adult education class…
…first you would have to convince them that weathermen can predict the weather
lol, right. We can predict 20 years into the future!! One week, not so much…….. using the same type of models.
“not only is global warming real, but the effects are already becoming serious”
It would be so nice if they would give evidence for it being real. Just saying so and then telling us that climate science is too complex (it really is not, only modeling it is very complex) for the commoner to understand is inadequate.
Evidence of the effects is also completely missing. That’s fun to be able to say and I can say it with confidence as we are cooling and nothing that they point to can be evidence of what they claim.
Al GOre missed the boat totally as we started really cooling in 2006 when he released his science fiction movie.
“Climate change” should be taught as such, that climate is not a constant and always changes. Also the “scientific method” should be taught, that all of science, even the theories of Newton and Einstein, are subject to review and reexamination. And that Hansen and Mann are not exactly Newton and Einstein.
Parroting unproved dogma as science is not the way to go in a “liberal” education.
Climate Change = Weather
Climate Change has and will aways occur i.e. Weather.
Enough of this scam and play on words.
The jig is almost over. 😉
It’s a true paradox. The “defenders of the science” are exactly the ones that want to teach children anti-scientific concepts such as “this year’s floods can be linked to man-made global warming“.
Sometimes I think we got lucky, the idiots dressed up the issue in political terms from day one at least in the USA, thereby guaranteeing the current conservative backlash. What if they had been smart enough to show an apolitical face at the start, as happened in Europe?