The Guardian worked tirelessly in 2008 to perfect biased Orwellian journalism in support of their demagogue. Now the tables have turned.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Instant Quagmire : the breakfast of Nobel Laureates.
Sarkozy’s face says it all………
Why aren’t the antiwar left making a continual fuss over Libya? We still haven’t heard the “Obama lied and people died” chant.
Slow but steady. How awful that the most powerful Nations in the West can’t do more in such a small country.
Oh ya, and by the way, why exactly did Obama send the US military into Libya and start killing people? It costs 1 billion a week? The reason given doesn’t add up since Iran and Syria have killed more of its people than Libya has. People in Syria are being killed right on tv. So why won’t the most transparent White House ever be transparent and transparently tell everyone the real reason Obama started a war in Libya?
Because it would make Glenn Beck look like he was right ?
I don’t follow what you mean. What did he say?
Oh, sorry I was working.
Glenn Beck said that they are using the UN and NATO
to prosecute a war against Libya, because nobody likes Qaddafi
and that makes it easy , and it legitimizes the UN “doctrine” of RoTP, a concept created and championed by, Samantha Power,
Wife of REgulatory Czar , Cass Sunnstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Power
The idea being, that once they do it to libya it will be an easy sell to do it to the intended victim, Israel, in the fall after they
recognize a Palestinian sate in the UN.
Samantha Power , who holds some ill defined advisory position in the white house has distinct opinions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFdt6fjdHQw
So like, its a plan.
That’s RTop, Responsibility to Protect .
The underlying reasoning for Libya.
adding this to “the plan”
One good thing.
The preponderance of military vessels still in the Med undoubtedly caused the postponement of a repeat of this distasteful incident wherein America’s favorite domestic terrorists meddle in foreign affairs to deliver broken wheelchairs from Turkey to the needy Hamastanians .
http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/ayers-dohrn-helped-organize-flotilla-group
http://globalmbreport.org/?p=4323
Amino ,
My comment with the explanation is in limbo at the moment.
I’ll Copy it here without the links or video.
Glenn Beck said that they are using the UN and NATO
to prosecute a war against Libya, because nobody likes Qaddafi
and that makes it easy , and it legitimizes the UN “doctrine” of RoTP, a concept created and championed by, Samantha Power,
Wife of Regulatory Czar , Cass Sunnstein
The idea being, that once they do it to libya it will be an easy sell to do it to the intended victim, Israel, in the fall after they
recognize a Palestinian sate in the UN. It’ll only be fair, the did it to libya.
Samantha Power , who holds some ill defined advisory position in the white house has distinct opinions.