WitchcraftClimate change was involved.There’s no way it wasn’t. The world we live in is a world warmed-up and altered by
witchesgreenhouse gases that wehave infiltratedput in ourcommunityatmosphere and that’s just the way it is. There is no control group. Every weather event we get is happening within the context ofwitchcrafta climate-changed world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Tornadoes in a climate changed world are completely different from those in a non climate changed world. They don’t kill 700 people like those in 1925.
VLT (very large telescope) time lapse…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFpeM3fxJoQ&feature=player_embedded#t=0s
That is beautiful.
Actually there is a control group. That control group is the below 300 – 350 ppm CO2 era, which didn’t lack for tornadoes or “extreme” weather.
If one closes ones eyes, puts ones fingers in ones ears and goes “lalalalalalalala”.. one cannot hear the tornadoes from the pre-350ppm era.
How many times must climate realists debunk these idiotic claims?
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/04/more-tornadoes-from-global-warming-thats-a-joke-right/
Justa Jow has a point. But if there is in fact no control group as the HuffPo claims, how are they controlling for variables? How do they know, in fact, that AGW is the change agent?
The fact that there is no exact control group means that one can’t be sure in applying heuristics derived from past climate. This means that assumptions of a dryer interior US are resting on a somewhat uncertain basis. It also means that seeing that it was hotter in the past doesn’t tell us with any assurance that we are in a state of normal atmospheric change.