WitchcraftClimate change was involved.There’s no way it wasn’t. The world we live in is a world warmed-up and altered by
witchesgreenhouse gases that wehave infiltratedput in ourcommunityatmosphere and that’s just the way it is. There is no control group. Every weather event we get is happening within the context ofwitchcrafta climate-changed world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast

Tornadoes in a climate changed world are completely different from those in a non climate changed world. They don’t kill 700 people like those in 1925.
VLT (very large telescope) time lapse…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFpeM3fxJoQ&feature=player_embedded#t=0s
That is beautiful.
Actually there is a control group. That control group is the below 300 – 350 ppm CO2 era, which didn’t lack for tornadoes or “extreme” weather.
If one closes ones eyes, puts ones fingers in ones ears and goes “lalalalalalalala”.. one cannot hear the tornadoes from the pre-350ppm era.
How many times must climate realists debunk these idiotic claims?
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/04/more-tornadoes-from-global-warming-thats-a-joke-right/
Justa Jow has a point. But if there is in fact no control group as the HuffPo claims, how are they controlling for variables? How do they know, in fact, that AGW is the change agent?
The fact that there is no exact control group means that one can’t be sure in applying heuristics derived from past climate. This means that assumptions of a dryer interior US are resting on a somewhat uncertain basis. It also means that seeing that it was hotter in the past doesn’t tell us with any assurance that we are in a state of normal atmospheric change.