Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
That could be one of today’s climatologists writing to another about the quality of information they have.
Maybe Hansen writing to Jones! De Mann is to young!
This writing is obviously before the advent of western white guilt, Jefferson is stubbornly refusing to accept responsibility for natural phenomenon.
Evil, greedy, rich, exploitative, slave holding straight white male bullies were already beginning to cause global wierding, even going back to 1809!
What would Jefferson say to the Alarmists if he were alive today? Would he be a sceptic?
In 1809, Jefferson no doubt thought the warming was natural, because there was warming. Except for the period 1979-1999 there hasn’t been significant warming since the 1930’a.
Also interesting to note, DC averaged less snowfall when Jefferson was President over 200 years ago than they do now.
Am I the only reader who thinks TJ is being a bit tongue in cheek here? “When I was a boy, the snow often came up to my waist. Now that I’m a grown (and historically tall) man, it rarely reaches my calf. When I was a boy of five or six a winter spanned a tenth of a lifetime; now as I am over sixty a winter scarcely mars one percent of my memories. And, just as when I was a boy facing the long winters and deep snow, thinking them formidible — yet the men who then were the age I am now assured me that the winters in their own youth were worse. ”
I’m thinking he’s pointing out the subjective nature of the, er, subject.