No wonder so many universities love McKibben. He also has no idea what he is talking about.
http://www.350.org/sites/all/files/science-factsheet-updated2011.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
- “We Are From The Government And We Are Here To Help”
- Blinken Not Happy Yet
- Chief Executive Kamala
- “Investigated And Discredited”
Recent Comments
- arn on Woke Grok
- Francis Barnett on Woke Grok
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Ivan G Wainwright on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- conrad ziefle on Grok Explains Gender
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Disillusioned on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Gordon Vigurs on Grok Explains Gender
- Gordon Vigurs on Woke Grok
Nothing happening in the present seems to be trending significantly in that direction.
You don’t understand…350 is the cumulative IQ of the members of that organization. A motion has been tabled last year to change the name to 352.org as lifelong members Mrs Rogers of Bluff, AZ remembered to lock the front door of the house after letting the cat in, thereby single-handedly increasing the IQ of McKibben’s group by two points.
However, the motion’s text has since been misplaced, and unless they get to 355 at least, nobody will have a clue where to find it.
Forgive them, or they do not know what they are doing.
That report is dated this year? They truly have lost it.
I’d like to see what their definition of “ice free” is. In all probability they are are probably clinging to Maslowki’s exagerrated prediction.
Either way, as I’ve stated in prior threads, the predictions of an ice free Arctic begun with dates like 2100 (IPCC) while others where saying 2050 and 2040. When it became obvious that the situation was worse than previously thought. The final official estimate was/is 2020-2030.
Maslowski with his 2013 date was an exception among serious scientists. The others, whom Steve is trying to paint as representative of serious Climate and Arctic scientists, were idiots.
In any case, who’s calling the kettle black? Please always remember and don’t ever forget, it was on WUWT that it was predicted that the Arctic ice cap was going to magically to recover to 1979 levels. Now take a deep breath; smell anything?
Show us the link, or you’re going to lose the pass we give you for stating such.
Now take a deep breath; smell anything?
Yeh, your BS.
The reason why I ask for the link is because I wanted to be the first to
suggeststate, avow, and affirm that it will, and I can hardly claim firsts if its already been done.I love it when people in this field actually make measurable, falsifiable positions. It’s like we’re actually talking about science again. Unfortunately for McKibben, this prediction will end up coming about as true as the moron cultist who predicted the world ending a few weeks ago.
IWB,
Is Mark Serreze a serious scientist?
He seems more like a serious hippie.