Hansen has been running around talking about catastrophic warming, hottest year ever, multi-metre sea level rise, death trains, extinction, end of the world as we know it…….etc.
Yet, but his own measures temperatures are below scenario C – which he considers safe. How can the climate be both catastrophic and safe at the same time?
That worked for funding in 1988….
….all you do is invent a new one for current funding
Not guilty by reason of mental illness?
It’s not about the temps or droughts any more.. It’s about the extreme weather that we’ve always had.. It’s catastrophic now because alarmists don’t have any memory of what it was like
catastrophicallysafewarming. Is that anything like warmcold, or droughtflood, or moistdry?
Anyway, as long as he says he was misquoted 10 years after the fact, and/or it was a “scenario” not a prediction, his supporters will say he was correct all along, or at least he will be right when “scenario whatever” occurs. Just wait and see, after we reach that tipping point, it will be worse than we thought……..blah blah blah.
Criminal……..prime candidate for a Tar n Feathering
Tar and Feathers is to humane! Honey while staked to an ant hill!
Hansen does not consider himself competent to Joust With Jesters so that rules out the Clown Scenario.
Right TonyD?
Are clown and criminal mutually exclusive? An excellent case can be made for both.
Clearly without a doubt Hansen is a CRIMINAL FRAUDSTER due to his continued use of DATA FABRICATION statistical fraud. At the point that he accepted money for his fabricated statistical data he became a criminal fraud artist – a con man of epic proportions due to the scale.
I think there is a 3rd option besides clown or criminal – agw alarmist fraud!
Clownimal!