I .. propose another stunt for climate sceptics – put your strong views to the test by exposing yourselves to high concentrations of either carbon dioxide or some other colourless, odourless gas – say, carbon monoxide.
You wouldn’t see or smell anything. Nor would your anti-science nonsense be heard of again. How very refreshing.
Ha ha ha, that’s great, tatoo people, toss people in the back of truck to get asphixiated, those people should get together and have some kind of meeting to come up with a ulitmate decision, no final… that’s it call it a Final Solution. Now where have I hear that before? Hummmm
What is with these Australian warmists? First it was Nazi-like tatoos, now its death by carbon monoxide. The beautiful thing about free speech is it allows morons like this to be exposed for what they really are … vindictive and full of hatred.
P.S. The e-mail I sent to Richard Glover about the Nazi tatoos got no response. I guess he didn’t like the idea of moving to Antarctica while I got beach-front property in Australia :).
Actually the twerp, Glover, has responded to the controversy. He’s calling everyone “haters” that called him on the carpet regarding his ugly suggestion to forcibly tattoo ‘deniers’
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/a-climate-change-wave-of-hate-20110609-1ftix.html#ixzz1OuZeB36q
Another stupid Australian idea (also proposed in the U.K) … carbon rationing:
http://www.foe.org.au/climate-justice/issues/climate-change-briefing/introduce-carbon-taxes-or-carbon-rationing/
Counter proposal – let them eat all the food they grow (and only the food they grow) in a greenhouse that consists of pure oxygen (or some nitrogen). Gas poisoning is relatively quick to starving to death.
This chick, Jill Singer, must have a scientific depth of about 1/2 of one one thousandth of an inch. What in the heck does incredulity regarding the PREDICTION(S) of imminent climate catastrophe due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions have to do with asphixiation from CO? How is breathing “high concentrations” of CO2 or CO a test of so-called climate change theory?
Ms. Singer due to her half assed understanding of chemistry seems to have developed a phobia of all gases. Does lil’ Ms. Singer believe that the CO2 concentration in the atmospere (*360 – 390ppm) are approaching a level where they could harm people. To actually have acute toxicity to CO2 a person would need to be exposed to 30,000ppm of CO2. So we’d have to increase the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere around 80X, and man only contributes some 4% of the CO2 as it is. Of course we can’t survive without CO2 as we know.
Ms. Jill should put her faith strong views to the test and swear off all CO2 use since it’s so dangerous. She would have to stop exhaling her highly CO2 concentrated bad breath for a start. Now that would be refreshing.
She should keep out of crowded places.
Looks like a John Galliano dress. 😉
Pachauris proposed we rub asbestos on our faces, while someone else proposed tatoos. Oh what nice people they are.
The parallels are striking.
Heil Gore!
She can breathe air without CO2- CO2 is essential to keep breathing. She’ll asphixiate for sure. Oxygen masks include CO2.